» Articles » PMID: 28243720

Extracting Cellular Automaton Rules from Physical Langevin Equation Models for Single and Collective Cell Migration

Overview
Journal J Math Biol
Date 2017 Mar 1
PMID 28243720
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cellular automata (CA) are discrete time, space, and state models which are extensively used for modeling biological phenomena. CA are "on-lattice" models with low computational demands. In particular, lattice-gas cellular automata (LGCA) have been introduced as models of single and collective cell migration. The interaction rule dictates the behavior of a cellular automaton model and is critical to the model's biological relevance. The LGCA model's interaction rule has been typically chosen phenomenologically. In this paper, we introduce a method to obtain lattice-gas cellular automaton interaction rules from physically-motivated "off-lattice" Langevin equation models for migrating cells. In particular, we consider Langevin equations related to single cell movement (movement of cells independent of each other) and collective cell migration (movement influenced by cell-cell interactions). As examples of collective cell migration, two different alignment mechanisms are studied: polar and nematic alignment. Both kinds of alignment have been observed in biological systems such as swarms of amoebae and myxobacteria. Polar alignment causes cells to align their velocities parallel to each other, whereas nematic alignment drives cells to align either parallel or antiparallel to each other. Under appropriate assumptions, we have derived the LGCA transition probability rule from the steady-state distribution of the off-lattice Fokker-Planck equation. Comparing alignment order parameters between the original Langevin model and the derived LGCA for both mechanisms, we found different areas of agreement in the parameter space. Finally, we discuss potential reasons for model disagreement and propose extensions to the CA rule derivation methodology.

Citing Articles

BIO-LGCA: A cellular automaton modelling class for analysing collective cell migration.

Deutsch A, Nava-Sedeno J, Syga S, Hatzikirou H PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(6):e1009066.

PMID: 34129639 PMC: 8232544. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009066.


Modelling collective cell motion: are on- and off-lattice models equivalent?.

Nava-Sedeno J, Voss-Bohme A, Hatzikirou H, Deutsch A, Peruani F Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 375(1807):20190378.

PMID: 32713300 PMC: 7423376. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0378.


NudCL2 regulates cell migration by stabilizing both myosin-9 and LIS1 with Hsp90.

Chen W, Wang W, Sun X, Xie S, Xu X, Liu M Cell Death Dis. 2020; 11(7):534.

PMID: 32665550 PMC: 7360774. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-02739-9.


Cellular automaton models for time-correlated random walks: derivation and analysis.

Nava-Sedeno J, Hatzikirou H, Klages R, Deutsch A Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):16952.

PMID: 29209065 PMC: 5717221. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17317-x.

References
1.
Kiskowski M, Alber M, Thomas G, Glazier J, Bronstein N, Pu J . Interplay between activator-inhibitor coupling and cell-matrix adhesion in a cellular automaton model for chondrogenic patterning. Dev Biol. 2004; 271(2):372-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.038. View

2.
Metzler . Generalized chapman-kolmogorov equation: A unifying approach to the description of anomalous transport in external fields. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 2000; 62(5 Pt A):6233-45. DOI: 10.1103/physreve.62.6233. View

3.
Belmonte J, Thomas G, Brunnet L, de Almeida R, Chate H . Self-propelled particle model for cell-sorting phenomena. Phys Rev Lett. 2008; 100(24):248702. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.248702. View

4.
Newman J, Sayama H . Effect of sensory blind zones on milling behavior in a dynamic self-propelled particle model. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008; 78(1 Pt 1):011913. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.011913. View

5.
Dickinson R, Tranquillo R . A stochastic model for adhesion-mediated cell random motility and haptotaxis. J Math Biol. 1993; 31(6):563-600. DOI: 10.1007/BF00161199. View