The Bony Bankart Lesion: How to Measure the Glenoid Bone Loss

Overview

Journal Pol J Radiol

Publisher Termedia

Specialty Radiology

Date 2017 Mar 1

PMID 28243338

Citations 10

Authors

Jaroslaw Skupinski

Malgorzata Zofia Piechota

Wojciech Wawrzynek

Jaroslaw Maczuch

Anna Babinska

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

An osseous Bankart lesion is commonly seen in patients with an anterior shoulder dislocation. It is defined as a detachment of the anteroinferior labrum associated with a glenoid rim fracture. Radiological studies are crucial not only for detecting glenoid bone defects but also for measuring the amount of bone loss. The precise quantification of the bony defect is crucial for the therapeutic desicion-making and clinical outcomes. Although we know that major glenoid bone loss requires surgical intervention, none of the studies performed so far answered the question what size of the defect should be an indication for open surgery procedures. Moreover, there is still no consensus on the exact percentage of glenoid loss that results in a higher risk of re-dislocations. In our opinion, there is a strong need for a consensus on universally accepted measuring techniques of the glenoid defect as well as on algorithms with validated glenoid bone loss threshold values for therapeutic decision-making. In this study, we review the techniques described so far in the literature and try to assess if any of these techniques should be treated as a leading method of detecting and quantifying osseous glenoid lesions.

Citing Articles

Clinical and radiological outcome following arthroscopic Latarjet with cerclage FiberTape fixation with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Nair A, Panakkal J, Mohan P, Rambhojan M, Thampy J S, Khan P JSES Int. 2024; 8(5):946-953.

PMID: 39280165 PMC: 11401552. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.020.

Assessing the current role of AP and Bernageau view radiographs in measurement of glenoid bone loss in patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation: correlation with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy.

Lohiya N, Hussein M, Sahu A, Aggarwal B, Maheshwari J, Iyengar K Skeletal Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39264417 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04797-y.

Anterior Shoulder Instability and Open Procedures: History, Indications, and Clinical Outcomes.

Fares M, Boufadel P, Daher M, Koa J, Khanna A, Abboud J Clin Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(4):521-533.

PMID: 37529197 PMC: 10375816. DOI: 10.4055/cios23018.

Designing and validating a comparison card method for quantification of glenoid bone defect.

Chen L, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Chen J, Hong Z, Ju J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16717.

PMID: 36202895 PMC: 9537312. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20908-y.

Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure Using FiberTape Cerclage With a Simplified Technique for Suture Passage and Coracoid Fixation.

Jos S, Sanu S, J A, Thomas M L, Paulose B Arthrosc Tech. 2022; 11(7):e1277-e1287.

PMID: 35936836 PMC: 9353334. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.03.011.

References

Gyftopoulos S, Yemin A, Mulholland T, Bloom M, Storey P, Geppert C . 3DMR osseous reconstructions of the shoulder using a gradient-echo based two-point Dixon reconstruction: a feasibility study. Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 42(3):347-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-012-1489-z. View

ROWE C, Patel D, Southmayd W . The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60(1):1-16. View

Lazarus M, Sidles J, Harryman 2nd D, Matsen 3rd F . Effect of a chondral-labral defect on glenoid concavity and glenohumeral stability. A cadaveric model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(1):94-102. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199601000-00013. View

Mologne T, Provencher M, Menzel K, Vachon T, Dewing C . Arthroscopic stabilization in patients with an inverted pear glenoid: results in patients with bone loss of the anterior glenoid. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(8):1276-83. DOI: 10.1177/0363546507300262. View

Huijsmans P, Haen P, Kidd M, Dhert W, van der Hulst V, Willems W . Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(6):803-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.115. View

Martins E Souza P, Brandao B, Brown E, Motta G, Monteiro M, Marchiori E . Recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability: the quantification of glenoid bone loss using magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2014; 43(8):1085-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-014-1894-6. View

Burkhart S, de Beer J, Barth J, Cresswell T, Criswell T, Roberts C . Results of modified Latarjet reconstruction in patients with anteroinferior instability and significant bone loss. Arthroscopy. 2007; 23(10):1033-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.009. View

Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Kanisawa I, Tsuchiya A . Arthroscopic osseous Bankart repair for chronic recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2:159-69. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00319. View

Burkhart S, DeBeer J, Tehrany A, Parten P . Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18(5):488-91. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.32212. View

10.

Griffith J, Antonio G, Tong C, Ming C . Anterior shoulder dislocation: quantification of glenoid bone loss with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180(5):1423-30. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801423. View

11.

Barchilon V, Kotz E, Barchilon Ben-Av M, Glazer E, Nyska M . A simple method for quantitative evaluation of the missing area of the anterior glenoid in anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint. Skeletal Radiol. 2008; 37(8):731-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-008-0506-8. View

12.

Roger B, Skaf A, Hooper A, Lektrakul N, Yeh L, Resnick D . Imaging findings in the dominant shoulder of throwing athletes: comparison of radiography, arthrography, CT arthrography, and MR arthrography with arthroscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172(5):1371-80. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.5.10227520. View

13.

Huijsmans P, de Witte P, de Villiers R, Wolterbeek D, Warmerdam P, Kruger N . Recurrent anterior shoulder instability: accuracy of estimations of glenoid bone loss with computed tomography is insufficient for therapeutic decision-making. Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40(10):1329-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1184-5. View

14.

Huysmans P, Haen P, Kidd M, Dhert W, Willems J . The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15(6):759-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.001. View

15.

Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M, Kon Y, Tsuchiya A . Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(5):878-84. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00016. View

16.

Sugaya H, Kon Y, Tsuchiya A . Arthroscopic repair of glenoid fractures using suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(5):635. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.02.006. View

17.

Shi L, Griffith J, Huang J, Wang D . Excellent side-to-side symmetry in glenoid size and shape. Skeletal Radiol. 2013; 42(12):1711-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1728-y. View

18.

Burkhart S, De Beer J . Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy. 2000; 16(7):677-94. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2000.17715. View

19.

Bigliani L, Newton P, Steinmann S, Connor P, McLlveen S . Glenoid rim lesions associated with recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26(1):41-5. DOI: 10.1177/03635465980260012301. View

20.

Gill T, Micheli L, Gebhard F, Binder C . Bankart repair for anterior instability of the shoulder. Long-term outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79(6):850-7. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199706000-00008. View