» Articles » PMID: 28239306

Sorting It Out: Eliciting Consumer Priorities for Recovery in Supportive Housing

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 Feb 28
PMID 28239306
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to understand participant priorities in their personal recovery journey and their perspectives of recovery domains.

Methods: A card sort data gathering technique was employed to elicit priorities in recovery from consumers in supportive housing programs serving formerly homeless adults with severe mental illnesses in New York City. Participants (N=38) were asked to sort 12 cards printed with recovery domains in order of importance and describe the meaning attached to each domain.

Results: Mental health (95%), physical health (89%), and housing (92%) were the domains most frequently included and prioritized in the top three rankings. Family (76%) and partner (74%) were also frequently included and endorsed as most important second only to mental health. Housing was prioritized yet rated most important less often (58%). Work, school, hobbies, program, friends and neighborhood were less frequently endorsed. 'Card sort talk' revealed critical understanding of participants' priorities and their reasons for endorsing other domains less frequently.

Conclusions: Most important to participants was regaining functional independence through improved mental and physical health and access to housing. With underlying principles of efficiency and empowerment, card sort is a promising engagement technique for providers to elicit consumer priorities in their own recovery.

Citing Articles

Perceiving Ethical Discomfort Triggered by Situations that Resist Meaning in Community Mental Health Settings: A Grounded Theory.

Jacques M, Quintin J, Lariviere N, Charpentier C Community Ment Health J. 2024; .

PMID: 39715981 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-024-01415-y.


Eliciting Life Priorities of Older Adults Living in Permanent Supportive Housing.

Padgett D, Bond L, Gurdak K, Henwood B Gerontologist. 2019; 60(1):60-68.

PMID: 31112594 PMC: 7182008. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnz040.

References
1.
Padgett D, Smith B, Henwood B, Tiderington E . Life course adversity in the lives of formerly homeless persons with serious mental illness: context and meaning. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2012; 82(3):421-30. PMC: 3422756. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01159.x. View

2.
Ali S, Ronaldson S . Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods. Br Med Bull. 2012; 103(1):21-44. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/lds020. View

3.
Whitley R, Drake R . Recovery: a dimensional approach. Psychiatr Serv. 2010; 61(12):1248-50. DOI: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.12.1248. View

4.
Byrne R, Morrison A . Service users' priorities and preferences for treatment of psychosis: a user-led Delphi study. Psychiatr Serv. 2014; 65(9):1167-9. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300289. View

5.
Corrigan P, Angell B, Davidson L, Marcus S, Salzer M, Kottsieper P . From adherence to self-determination: evolution of a treatment paradigm for people with serious mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv. 2012; 63(2):169-73. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100065. View