Optimal Primary Management of Bulky Stage IIIC Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Peritoneal Carcinoma: Are the Only Options Complete Gross Resection at Primary Debulking Surgery or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To explore the impact of primary debulking surgery (PDS) to minimal but gross residual disease (RD) in women with bulky stage IIIC ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with the aforementioned diagnosis who underwent PDS at our institution from 01/2001-12/2010. Those with disease of non-epithelial histology or borderline tumors were excluded. Clinicopathologic data were abstracted, and appropriate statistical tests were used.
Results: We identified 496 eligible patients. Median age was 62years; 91% had disease of serous histology. Patients were grouped by RD status: no gross RD, 184 (37%); RD of 1-5mm, 127 (26%); RD of 6-10mm, 54 (11%); and RD >10mm, 131 (26%). With a median follow-up of 53months, the median progression-free survivals (PFS) were: 26.7, 20.7, 16.2, and 13.6months, respectively (p<0.001). The median overall survivals (OS) were 83.4, 54.5, 43.8, and 38.9months, respectively (p<0.001). Among patients with RD following PDS, those with RD of 1-10mm had improved PFS (p<0.001) and OS (p=0.001) compared with those with RD >10mm. Patients with RD 1-10mm who received intravenous/intraperitoneal (IV/IP) chemotherapy were younger and had prolonged OS compared with those solely exposed to IV chemotherapy (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively).
Conclusions: PDS to no gross RD was associated with the longest PFS and OS. However, cytoreduction to 1-10mm of RD was also associated with better survival outcomes compared with cytoreduction to >10mm of RD. We conclude that PDS remains an appropriate option for patients with a high likelihood of achieving RD 1-10mm, especially for younger patients who can receive IV/IP chemotherapy after PDS.
Jankowska-Lombarska M, Grabowska-Derlatka L, Kraj L, Derlatka P Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(22).
PMID: 39594694 PMC: 11591656. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16223738.
Heterogeneity and treatment landscape of ovarian carcinoma.
Veneziani A, Gonzalez-Ochoa E, Alqaisi H, Madariaga A, Bhat G, Rouzbahman M Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023; 20(12):820-842.
PMID: 37783747 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00819-1.
Perrone A, Coada C, Ravegnini G, De Leo A, Damiano G, De Crescenzo E Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023; 33(8):1270-1278.
PMID: 37429642 PMC: 10423511. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004249.
Pinto P, Burgetova A, Cibula D, Haldorsen I, Indrielle-Kelly T, Fischerova D Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(6).
PMID: 36980790 PMC: 10047411. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061904.
Grabowska-Derlatka L, Derlatka P, Halaburda-Rola M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(5).
PMID: 36900244 PMC: 10000545. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051453.