» Articles » PMID: 28234929

A Three-way Approach for Protein Function Classification

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Feb 25
PMID 28234929
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The knowledge of protein functions plays an essential role in understanding biological cells and has a significant impact on human life in areas such as personalized medicine, better crops and improved therapeutic interventions. Due to expense and inherent difficulty of biological experiments, intelligent methods are generally relied upon for automatic assignment of functions to proteins. The technological advancements in the field of biology are improving our understanding of biological processes and are regularly resulting in new features and characteristics that better describe the role of proteins. It is inevitable to neglect and overlook these anticipated features in designing more effective classification techniques. A key issue in this context, that is not being sufficiently addressed, is how to build effective classification models and approaches for protein function prediction by incorporating and taking advantage from the ever evolving biological information. In this article, we propose a three-way decision making approach which provides provisions for seeking and incorporating future information. We considered probabilistic rough sets based models such as Game-Theoretic Rough Sets (GTRS) and Information-Theoretic Rough Sets (ITRS) for inducing three-way decisions. An architecture of protein functions classification with probabilistic rough sets based three-way decisions is proposed and explained. Experiments are carried out on Saccharomyces cerevisiae species dataset obtained from Uniprot database with the corresponding functional classes extracted from the Gene Ontology (GO) database. The results indicate that as the level of biological information increases, the number of deferred cases are reduced while maintaining similar level of accuracy.

Citing Articles

Fostering effective hybrid human-LLM reasoning and decision making.

Passerini A, Gema A, Minervini P, Sayin B, Tentori K Front Artif Intell. 2025; 7():1464690.

PMID: 39845098 PMC: 11751230. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1464690.


An analogue of a kinase inhibitor exhibits subjective characteristics that contribute to its inhibitory activities as a potential anti-cancer candidate: insights through computational biomolecular modelling of UM-164 binding with lyn protein.

Ndagi U, Abdullahi M, Hamza A, Soliman M RSC Adv. 2022; 10(1):145-161.

PMID: 35492550 PMC: 9047091. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra07204g.


Self-assembled peptide and protein nanostructures for anti-cancer therapy: Targeted delivery, stimuli-responsive devices and immunotherapy.

Delfi M, Sartorius R, Ashrafizadeh M, Sharifi E, Zhang Y, De Berardinis P Nano Today. 2021; 38.

PMID: 34267794 PMC: 8276870. DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101119.

References
1.
Nabieva E, Jim K, Agarwal A, Chazelle B, Singh M . Whole-proteome prediction of protein function via graph-theoretic analysis of interaction maps. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21 Suppl 1:i302-10. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1054. View

2.
Pauker S, Kassirer J . The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1980; 302(20):1109-17. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198005153022003. View

3.
Vazquez A, Flammini A, Maritan A, Vespignani A . Global protein function prediction from protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2003; 21(6):697-700. DOI: 10.1038/nbt825. View

4.
Hovland C, HARVEY O, Sherif M . Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. J Abnorm Psychol. 1957; 55(2):244-52. DOI: 10.1037/h0048480. View

5.
Pearson W, Lipman D . Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988; 85(8):2444-8. PMC: 280013. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444. View