» Articles » PMID: 28233585

How Oncologists' Communication Improves (analogue) Patients' Recall of Information. A Randomized Video-vignettes Study

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Health Services
Nursing
Date 2017 Feb 25
PMID 28233585
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Cancer patients need information provision to cope with their disease. However, only 20-60% of information provided during consultations is remembered. This study aimed to investigate whether oncologists' use of trust-conveying communication, characterized by communicating competence, honesty and caring, enhances patients' memory. Moreover, we aimed to investigate if this hypothetical relationship is mediated by a reduction in psychophysiological arousal during the consultation.

Methods: An experimental design was used, allowing for conclusion about causality. Two versions of a scripted video-taped consultation were used in which the oncologist adopted either a standard or a trust-conveying communication style. 97 cancer-naive individuals acted as analogue patients and were randomly assigned to watch one of the consultations.

Results: Free recall, assessed 24-28h after viewing, was higher (p=0.039) in the trust-conveying condition (65.3% versus 59.5%). Recognition did not differ (p=0.502). Psychophysiological assessment during watching showed a smaller heart rate response in the trust-conveying condition (p=0.037). No mediation effect nor an effect on electrodermal activity was found.

Conclusion: These results suggest that oncologists' use of trust-conveying communication could increase patients' free recall of information and diminish their cardiovascular response.

Practice Implications: The underlying mechanisms by which oncologists' communication influences information recall warrants further investigation.

Citing Articles

Role of the Surgeon in De-Escalating Emotion During a Breast Cancer Surgery Consultation: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experiences in Alliance A231701CD.

Saucke M, Jacobson N, McKinney G, Neuman H Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(13):8873-8881.

PMID: 39320397 PMC: 11803603. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16156-1.


Creating and administering video vignettes for a study examining the communication of diagnostic uncertainty: methodological insights to improve accessibility for researchers and participants.

Cox C, Hatfield T, Moxey J, Fritz Z BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; 23(1):296.

PMID: 38102577 PMC: 10722843. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02072-7.


Identifying best practices for disclosure of amyloid imaging results: A randomized controlled trial.

Fruijtier A, Van Der Schaar J, van Maurik I, Zwan M, Scheltens P, Bouwman F Alzheimers Dement. 2022; 19(1):285-295.

PMID: 35366050 PMC: 10084251. DOI: 10.1002/alz.12630.


Patients' Perspectives on Trust and Trustworthiness of Health Care Organizations.

Greene J Milbank Q. 2022; 100(2):365-369.

PMID: 35289423 PMC: 9205666. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12556.


Communicating the diagnosis of cancer or depression: Results of a randomized controlled online study using video vignettes.

Kuhne F, Fauth H, Ay-Bryson D, Visser L, Weck F Cancer Med. 2021; 10(24):9012-9021.

PMID: 34747132 PMC: 8683534. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4396.