» Articles » PMID: 28231646

Arthroscopic Control for Safe and Secure Seating of Suspensory Devices for Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three Different Techniques

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Feb 24
PMID 28231646
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of our technique that allows direct visualization of seating of suspensory devices in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Materials And Methods: Three different suspensory devices (TightRope RT, RetroButton, and EndoButton) were used in ACL reconstruction using 3 different techniques (outside-in, anteromedial [AM] portal, and transtibial techniques). Positioning of a guiding material and seating pattern of the suspensory devices were evaluated according to the surgical technique and suspensory device used.

Results: On the transtibial technique, 21 of total 26 cases (81%) of single bundle reconstructions and 22 of total 22 cases (100%) of double bundle reconstructions required superolateral capsulotomy where buttons were found in 21 of total 21 cases (100%) and 17 of 22 cases (77%), respectively. On the AM portal technique, all patients required capsulotomy and the button was found in only 18 of total 32 cases (56%) even after capsulotomy. On the outside-in technique, all patients required capsulotomy and the button was found in 86 of total 86 cases (100%).

Conclusions: Our technique for direct visualization of seating of the suspensory devices was more effective in outside-in and single bundle transtibial ACL reconstruction. However, it was less effective in double bundle transtibial and AM portal ACL reconstructions.

Citing Articles

Complications following all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Lin T, Chung C, Chen W, Su C, Fang H, Lu Y Int Orthop. 2022; 46(11):2569-2576.

PMID: 35859213 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05515-w.


Confirming Proper Button Deployment of Suspensory Fixation During ACL Reconstruction.

OBrien D, Fones L, Stoj V, Edgar C, Coyner K, Arciero R Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(1):2325967120974349.

PMID: 33521157 PMC: 7817951. DOI: 10.1177/2325967120974349.


The transportal technique shows better clinical results than the transtibial techniques for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Ro K, Kim H, Lee D Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 26(8):2371-2380.

PMID: 29189882 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4786-1.

References
1.
Lee Y, Lee B, Chun D . Flipping method of a RetroButton during ACL reconstruction with outside-in femoral drilling using a FlipCutter. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(10):861-4. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120919-04. View

2.
Yanmis I, Tunay S, Oguz E, Yildiz C, Ozkan H, Kirdemir V . Dropping of an EndoButton into the knee joint 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament repair using proximal fixation methods. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20(6):641-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.03.016. View

3.
Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong A, Tashman S, Anderst W, Irrgang J . Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(6):1427-31. PMC: 2874668. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00655. View

4.
Sonnery-Cottet B, Rezende F, Martins Neto A, Fayard J, Thaunat M, Kader D . Arthroscopically confirmed femoral button deployment. Arthrosc Tech. 2014; 3(3):e309-12. PMC: 4130137. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2014.01.007. View

5.
Kamelger F, Onder U, Schmoelz W, Tecklenburg K, Arora R, Fink C . Suspensory fixation of grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of 3 implants. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(7):767-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.01.021. View