» Articles » PMID: 28230640

Disparities in Waitlist and Posttransplantation Outcomes in Liver Transplant Registrants and Recipients Aged 18 to 24 Years: Analysis of the UNOS Database

Overview
Journal Transplantation
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 Feb 24
PMID 28230640
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We evaluated liver transplantation waitlist and posttransplantation outcomes in those aged 18 to 24 years compared with both younger (0-17 years) and older (25-34 years) registrants and recipients.

Methods: Using national data from the United Network for Organ Sharing, competing risk, Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed on first-time liver transplant registrants (n = 13 979) and recipients (n = 8718) ages 0 to 34 years between 2002 and 2015.

Results: Nonstatus 1A registrants, registrants aged 0 to 17 and 25 to 34 years were less likely to experience dropout from the waiting list compared with those aged 18 to 24 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 0-5 years = 0.36; 6-11 = 0.29; 12-17 = 0.48; 18-24 = 1.00; 25-34 = 0.82). Although there was no difference in risk of graft failure across all age groups, both younger and older age groups had significantly lower risk of posttransplant mortality compared with those aged 18 to 24 years (adjusted hazard ratio, for 0-5 years = 0.53, 6-11 = 0.48, 12-17 = 0.70, 18-24 = 1.00, 25-34 = 0.77). This may be related to lower likelihood of retransplantation after graft failure in those aged 18 to 24 years.

Conclusions: This national registry study demonstrates for the first time poorer waitlist and postliver transplant outcomes in young adults ages 18 to 24 years at the time of listing and transplantation compared to older and younger age groups. Given the potential survival benefit in transplanting young adults and the shortage of solid organs for transplant, future studies are critical to identify and target modifiable risk factors to improve waitlist and long-term posttransplant outcomes in 18- to 24-year-old registrants and recipients.

Citing Articles

Liver Transplantation for Biliary Atresia in Adulthood: Single-Centre Surgical Experience.

Cortes-Cerisuelo M, Boumpoureka C, Cassar N, Joshi D, Samyn M, Heneghan M J Clin Med. 2021; 10(21).

PMID: 34768489 PMC: 8584637. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214969.


Impact of Payer Status on Delisting Among Liver Transplant Candidates in the United States.

Karunungan K, Sanaiha Y, Hernandez R, Wilhalme H, Rudasill S, Hadaya J Liver Transpl. 2020; 27(2):200-208.

PMID: 33185336 PMC: 8281984. DOI: 10.1002/lt.25936.

References
1.
Freeman Jr R, Wiesner R, Roberts J, McDiarmid S, Dykstra D, Merion R . Improving liver allocation: MELD and PELD. Am J Transplant. 2004; 4 Suppl 9:114-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6135.2004.00403.x. View

2.
McDiarmid S, Gish R, Horslen S, Mazariegos G . Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception for unusual metabolic liver diseases. Liver Transpl. 2006; 12(12 Suppl 3):S124-7. DOI: 10.1002/lt.20973. View

3.
Goldberg D, Makar G, Bittermann T, French B . Center variation in the use of nonstandardized model for end-stage liver disease exception points. Liver Transpl. 2013; 19(12):1330-42. DOI: 10.1002/lt.23732. View

4.
Fredericks E, Magee J, Eder S, Sevecke J, Dore-Stites D, Shieck V . Quality Improvement Targeting Adherence During the Transition from a Pediatric to Adult Liver Transplant Clinic. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2015; 22(2-3):150-9. PMC: 4698799. DOI: 10.1007/s10880-015-9427-6. View

5.
Kim W, Lake J, Smith J, Skeans M, Schladt D, Edwards E . OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15 Suppl 2:1-28. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13197. View