» Articles » PMID: 28226199

Mortality Risk Factors Among Patients With Cirrhosis and a Low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium Score (≤15): An Analysis of Liver Transplant Allocation Policy Using Aggregated Electronic Health Record Data

Overview
Journal Am J Transplant
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 Feb 23
PMID 28226199
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease sodium (MELD Na) score is now used for liver transplant allocation in the United States, mortality prediction may be underestimated by the score. Using aggregated electronic health record data from 7834 adult patients with cirrhosis, we determined whether the cause of cirrhosis or cirrhosis complications was associated with an increased risk of death among patients with a MELD Na score ≤15 and whether patients with the greatest risk of death could benefit from liver transplantation (LT). Over median follow-up of 2.3 years, 3715 patients had a maximum MELD Na score ≤15. Overall, 3.4% were waitlisted for LT. Severe hypoalbuminemia, hepatorenal syndrome, and hepatic hydrothorax conferred the greatest risk of death independent of MELD Na score with 1-year predicted mortality >14%. Approximately 10% possessed these risk factors. Of these high-risk patients, only 4% were waitlisted for LT, despite no difference in nonliver comorbidities between waitlisted patients and those not listed. In addition, risk factors for death among waitlisted patients were the same as those for patients not waitlisted, although the effect of malnutrition was significantly greater for waitlisted patients (hazard ratio 8.65 [95% CI 2.57-29.11] vs. 1.47 [95% CI 1.08-1.98]). Using the MELD Na score for allocation may continue to limit access to LT.

Citing Articles

Disease trajectory and competing risks of patients with cirrhosis in the US.

Mohammadi M, Hasjim B, Balbale S, Polineni P, Huang A, Paukner M PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0313152.

PMID: 39951428 PMC: 11828360. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313152.


Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: Addressing gaps in care.

Batisti J, Jakab S Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2024; 23(1):e0211.

PMID: 38961874 PMC: 11221856. DOI: 10.1097/CLD.0000000000000211.


Where you live matters: Area deprivation predicts poor survival and liver transplant waitlisting.

Hasjim B, Huang A, Paukner M, Polineni P, Harris A, Mohammadi M Am J Transplant. 2024; 24(5):803-817.

PMID: 38346498 PMC: 11070293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.009.


Survival after living donor liver transplantation versus best supportive care in patients with end-stage liver disease with various MELD-Na scores: retrospective cohort study.

Oh N, Kim J, Han S, Jo S, An S, Park S BJS Open. 2023; 7(6).

PMID: 38011798 PMC: 10681711. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad127.


MELD 3.0 adequately predicts mortality and renal replacement therapy requirements in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis.

Diaz L, Fuentes-Lopez E, Ayares G, Idalsoaga F, Arnold J, Ayala Valverde M JHEP Rep. 2023; 5(8):100727.

PMID: 37456675 PMC: 10339256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100727.


References
1.
Lai J, Dodge J, Sen S, Covinsky K, Feng S . Functional decline in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation: Results from the functional assessment in liver transplantation (FrAILT) study. Hepatology. 2015; 63(2):574-80. PMC: 4718851. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28316. View

2.
Kamath P, Wiesner R, Malinchoc M, Kremers W, Therneau T, Kosberg C . A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001; 33(2):464-70. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.22172. View

3.
Dignam J, Zhang Q, Kocherginsky M . The use and interpretation of competing risks regression models. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18(8):2301-8. PMC: 3328633. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2097. View

4.
Kim W, Smith J, Skeans M, Schladt D, Schnitzler M, Edwards E . OPTN/SRTR 2012 Annual Data Report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2013; 14 Suppl 1:69-96. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12581. View

5.
Schrader E, Grosch E, Bertsch T, Sieber C, Volkert D . Nutritional and Functional Status in Geriatric Day Hospital Patients - MNA Short Form Versus Full MNA. J Nutr Health Aging. 2016; 20(9):918-926. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-016-0691-4. View