The Assessment of Estrogen Receptor Status and Its Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Patients With Breast Cancer by Using 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET/CT
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of F-fluoroestradiol (F-FES) PET/CT in the assessment of the estrogen receptor (ER) and its intratumoral heterogeneity in breast cancer patients.
Methods: Forty-six female patients (50 lesions) with histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer who underwent both F-FES and F-FDG PET/CT in our center were retrospectively included. All the patients enrolled were scheduled to undergo biopsy. The F-FES and FDG uptakes were compared with pathological features (tumor size, ER, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and Ki67%). The optimal threshold to discriminate ER-positive and ER-negative lesions was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Furthermore, we observed the intratumoral heterogeneity by a heterogeneity index (SUVmax/SUVmean) and compared the results with the Chang-Gung Image Texture Analysis.
Results: There was good agreement between F-FES uptake and ER, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression (P < 0.001), and the use of SUVmean instead of SUVmax can provide a slightly better correlation. The optimal threshold for F-FES PET/CT to discriminate between ER-positive and ER-negative lesions, as determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, was an SUVmax of 1.82 (sensitivity = 88.2% and specificity = 87.5%) and SUVmean of 1.21 (sensitivity = 85.3% and specificity = 93.7). Our simplified heterogeneity index-FES can easily observe ER heterogeneity. In addition, our results suggested that recurrent/metastatic patients and lesions located other than breast might have greater heterogeneity.
Conclusions: F-FES PET/CT is a feasible, noninvasive method for assessing ER expression in breast cancer patients. Because intratumoral heterogeneity exists, F-FES PET/CT might better reflect the ER expression, especially in metastatic patients after treatment, thus assisting in making individualized treatment decisions.
Head-to-Head comparison of [F]FES and [F]FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients: has a new era come?.
Guglielmo P, Mazzola R, Darwish S, Valenti F, De Pas T, Setti L Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; .
PMID: 40067459 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07186-2.
Liu C, Ma G, Zhang J, Cheng J, Yang Z, Song S Ann Nucl Med. 2023; 37(12):675-684.
PMID: 37787851 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-023-01871-8.
Matushita C, Coelho F, Stasiak C, Rodrigues D, Pianta D, Kurkowski F Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023; 69(suppl 1):e2023S116.
PMID: 37556635 PMC: 10411708. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.2023S116.
Pellegrino S, Fonti R, Hakkak Moghadam Torbati A, Bologna R, Morra R, Damiano V Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(14).
PMID: 37510192 PMC: 10378511. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142448.
PET-Derived Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Urso L, Manco L, Castello A, Evangelista L, Guidi G, Castellani M Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(21).
PMID: 36362190 PMC: 9653918. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232113409.