» Articles » PMID: 28219961

Protocol for the Development of a Core Domain Set for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Trial Outcomes

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Feb 22
PMID 28219961
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) should have well-defined primary and secondary outcomes to answer questions generated by the main hypotheses. However, for the chronic, inflammatory skin disease hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), the reported outcome measures are numerous and diverse. A recent systematic review found a total of 30 outcome measure instruments in 12 RCTs. This use of a broad range of outcome measures can increase difficulties in interpretation and comparison of results and may potentially obstruct appropriate evidence synthesis by causing reporting bias. One strategy for dealing with these problems is to develop a core outcome set (COS). A COS is a list of outcomes that are meant as mandatory and should be measured and reported in all clinical trials. The aim of this study is to develop a COS for the management of HS.

Method And Analysis: An international steering group of researchers, clinicians and a patient research partner will guide the COS development. 6 stakeholder groups are involved: patients, dermatologists, surgeons, nurses, industry representatives and drug regulatory authorities. A 1:1 ratio of patients:healthcare professionals is aimed for. The initial list of candidate items will be obtained by combining three data sets: (1) a systematic review of the literature, (2) US and Danish qualitative interview studies involving patients with HS and (3) an online healthcare professional (HCP) item generation survey. To reach consensus on the COS, 4 anonymous online Delphi rounds are then planned together with 2 face-to-face consensus meetings (1 in Europe and 1 in the USA) to ensure global representation.

Ethics And Dissemination: The study will be performed according to the Helsinki declaration. All results from the study, including inconclusive or negative results, will be published in peer-reviewed indexed journals. The study will involve different stakeholder groups to ensure that the developed COS will be suitable and well accepted.

Citing Articles

Pyoderma gangrenosum refined elements for core item selection and evaluation (PRECISE-PG): a study protocol for reaching consensus on core outcome domain items in clinical trials of pyoderma gangrenosum.

Tobey T, Ortega-Loayza A, Choe S, Haddadin O, Bardazzi F, Croitoru D Arch Dermatol Res. 2025; 317(1):449.

PMID: 39979653 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-025-03920-w.


Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study: the THESEUS prospective cohort study.

Ingram J, Bates J, Cannings-John R, Collier F, Gibbons A, Harris C Health Technol Assess. 2023; 27(30):1-107.

PMID: 38149635 PMC: 11017627. DOI: 10.3310/HWNM2189.


Overview and comparison of the clinical scores in hidradenitis suppurativa: A real-life clinical data.

Daoud M, Suppa M, Benhadou F, Daxhelet M, Njimi H, White J Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1145152.

PMID: 37138732 PMC: 10149852. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1145152.


Novel mixed-method, inclusive protocol involving global key stakeholders, including carers as experts, to co-develop relevant Caregiver-Reported Outcome Domains (CRODs) in skin disease.

Walsh C, Leavey G, Mc Laughlin M, Paller A, Irvine A, Browne F BMJ Open. 2023; 13(1):e068893.

PMID: 36657764 PMC: 9853252. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068893.


The "Understanding Pyoderma Gangrenosum, Review and Assessment of Disease Effects (UPGRADE)" Project: a protocol for the development of the core outcome domain set for trials in pyoderma gangrenosum.

Rick J, Gould L, Marzano A, Garg A, Chen D, Oakes D Arch Dermatol Res. 2022; 315(4):983-988.

PMID: 36305958 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-022-02424-1.


References
1.
Kimball A, Kerdel F, Adams D, Mrowietz U, Gelfand J, Gniadecki R . Adalimumab for the treatment of moderate to severe Hidradenitis suppurativa: a parallel randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(12):846-55. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-12-201212180-00004. View

2.
Sartorius K, Killasli H, Heilborn J, Jemec G, Lapins J, Emtestam L . Interobserver variability of clinical scores in hidradenitis suppurativa is low. Br J Dermatol. 2010; 162(6):1261-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09715.x. View

3.
Jemec G, Heidenheim M, Nielsen N . Hidradenitis suppurativa--characteristics and consequences. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1996; 21(6):419-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1996.tb00145.x. View

4.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G . GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64(4):395-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012. View

5.
Tugwell P, Boers M, Brooks P, Simon L, Strand V, Idzerda L . OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology. Trials. 2007; 8:38. PMC: 2169260. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-38. View