» Articles » PMID: 28214741

Identifying "social Smoking" U.S. Young Adults Using an Empirically-driven Approach

Overview
Journal Addict Behav
Date 2017 Feb 20
PMID 28214741
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The phenomenon of "social smoking" emerged in the past decade as an important area of research, largely due to its high prevalence in young adults. The purpose of this study was to identify classes of young adult ever smokers based on measures of social and contextual influences on tobacco use. Latent class models were developed using social smoking measures, and not the frequency or quantity of tobacco use. Data come from a national sample of young adult ever smokers aged 18-24 (Truth Initiative Young Adult Cohort Study, N=1564). The optimal models identified three latent classes: Class 1 - nonsmokers (52%); Class 2 - social smokers (18%); and Class 3 - smokers (30%). Nearly 60% of the "social smoker" class self-identified as a social smoker, 30% as an ex-smoker/tried smoking, and 12% as a non-smoker. The "social smoker" class was most likely to report using tobacco mainly or only with others. Past 30-day cigarette use was highest in the "smoker" class. Hookah use was highest in the "social smoker" class. Other tobacco and e-cigarette use was similar in the "social smoker" and "smoker" classes. Past 30-day tobacco and e-cigarette use was present for all products in the "non-smoker" class. Young adult social smokers emerge empirically as a sizable, distinct class from other smokers, even without accounting for tobacco use frequency or intensity. The prevalence of hookah use in "social smokers" indicates a group for which the social aspect of tobacco use could drive experimentation and progression to regular use.

Citing Articles

Smoking Trajectory Classes and Impact of Social Smoking Identity in Two Cohorts of U.S. Young Adults.

Johnson A, Villanti A, Williams V, Rath J, Vallone D, Abrams D Emerg Adulthood. 2024; 7(4):258-269.

PMID: 38250305 PMC: 10798807. DOI: 10.1177/2167696818763949.


Socializing with Smoker and Social Smoking Behavior among Chinese Male Smokers with Low Nicotine Dependence: The Mediating Roles of Belief of Smoking Rationalization and Smoker Identity.

Zhang Y, Wang J, Lai K, Bian H, Chen H, Gao L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(22).

PMID: 36429485 PMC: 9690624. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214765.


Non-daily Cigarette Smoking: Stability and Transition to Abstinence in Young Adults.

Doran N, Myers M, Luczak S, Trim R, Strong D, Tully L Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 25(1):151-158.

PMID: 35931100 PMC: 9717379. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac189.


Visual Attention to Health Warning Labels on Waterpipe Venue Menus in Immersive Virtual Reality.

Kidanu A, Shi R, Cruz-Cano R, Feldman R, Butler J, Dyer T Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 24(9):1469-1477.

PMID: 35135010 PMC: 9356687. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac030.


Integrating Self-Report and Psychophysiological Measures in Waterpipe Tobacco Message Testing: A Novel Application of Multi-Attribute Decision Modeling.

Stevens E, Villanti A, Leshner G, Wagener T, Keller-Hamilton B, Mays D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(22).

PMID: 34831571 PMC: 8617707. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182211814.


References
1.
Klein E, Forster J, Erickson D . Longitudinal predictors of stopping smoking in young adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2013; 53(3):363-7. PMC: 3755032. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.012. View

2.
Schane R, Glantz S, Ling P . Nondaily and social smoking: an increasingly prevalent pattern. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(19):1742-4. PMC: 4350771. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.315. View

3.
Sharma E, Beck K, Clark P . Social context of smoking hookah among college students: scale development and validation. J Am Coll Health. 2013; 61(4):204-11. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2013.787621. View

4.
Sutfin E, McCoy T, Berg C, Champion H, Helme D, OBrien M . Tobacco use by college students: a comparison of daily and nondaily smokers. Am J Health Behav. 2012; 36(2):218-29. PMC: 3693762. DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.36.2.7. View

5.
Primack B, Carroll M, Shensa A, Davis W, Levine M . Sex Differences in Hookah-Related Images Posted on Tumblr: A Content Analysis. J Health Commun. 2016; 21(3):366-75. PMC: 4873310. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1095814. View