» Articles » PMID: 28212451

Relationship Between Pre-anesthetic and Intra-anesthetic Airway Resistance in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Feb 18
PMID 28212451
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Surgery patients in Japan undergo routine spirometry testing prior to general anesthesia. The use of a flow sensor during general anesthesia has recently become common. However, it is not certain whether the information derived from flow-volume curves is being adequately used for mechanical ventilation management during general anesthesia. So far, there have been no attempts to calculate airway resistance using flow-volume curves. Therefore, we performed a prospective, observational study to investigate the relationship between pre-anesthetic and intra-anesthetic airway resistance in patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia. We calculated pre-anesthetic and intra-anesthetic airway resistance in each patient, based on the slopes of flow-volume curves obtained prior to and during general anesthesia. We also calculated endotracheal tube resistance to correct the intra-anesthetic airway resistance values calculated. A total of 526 patients were included in the study, and 98 patients had a forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity ratio of < 70%. Pre-anesthetic airway resistance was significantly higher in patients with airflow obstruction than in those without airflow obstruction (p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference in intra-anesthetic airway resistance was found between patients with and without airflow obstruction during mechanical ventilation (p = 0.48). Pre-anesthetic and intra-anesthetic airway resistance values were closer to each other in patients without airflow obstruction, with a mean difference < 1.0 cmH2O L-1s-1, than in those with airflow obstruction, although these respiratory parameters were significantly different (p < 0.001). Intra-anesthetic airway resistance was not related to the FEV1/FVC ratio, regardless of the degree to which the FEV1/FVC ratio reflected pre-anesthetic airway resistance. As compared with patients with airflow obstruction, the mean difference between pre-anesthetic and intra-anesthetic airway resistance was small in patients without airflow obstruction.

Citing Articles

Predictors for intraoperative heart failure in children undergoing foreign-body removal.

Yao X, Zhang L, Zhao G, Pang H, Li T, Han X Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(28):e26626.

PMID: 34260551 PMC: 8284771. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026626.


Heat and moisture exchanger used in a cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit: Airway resistance and changing interval.

Liu H, Wang H, Mu Z, Ye L, Jiang Y Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2021; 28(4):593-600.

PMID: 33403131 PMC: 7759046. DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2020.20088.


Reference value for expiratory time constant calculated from the maximal expiratory flow-volume curve.

Ikeda T, Yamauchi Y, Uchida K, Oba K, Nagase T, Yamada Y BMC Pulm Med. 2019; 19(1):208.

PMID: 31711456 PMC: 6849182. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-019-0976-6.

References
1.
Wilt T, Niewoehner D, Kim C, Kane R, Linabery A, Tacklind J . Use of spirometry for case finding, diagnosis, and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2005; (121):1-7. PMC: 4781180. DOI: 10.1037/e439492005-001. View

2.
MacIntyre N . Spirometry for the diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Care. 2009; 54(8):1050-7. View

3.
Goldman M . Clinical application of forced oscillation. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 14(5):341-50. DOI: 10.1006/pupt.2001.0310. View

4.
Macklem P, Mead J . Resistance of central and peripheral airways measured by a retrograde catheter. J Appl Physiol. 1967; 22(3):395-401. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1967.22.3.395. View

5.
Oostveen E, MacLeod D, Lorino H, Farre R, Hantos Z, Desager K . The forced oscillation technique in clinical practice: methodology, recommendations and future developments. Eur Respir J. 2003; 22(6):1026-41. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00089403. View