» Articles » PMID: 28209734

Neural Representations of Observed Actions Generalize Across Static and Dynamic Visual Input

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Feb 18
PMID 28209734
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People interact with entities in the environment in distinct and categorizable ways (e.g., is ). We can recognize these action categories across variations in actors, objects, and settings; moreover, we can recognize them from both dynamic and static visual input. However, the neural systems that support action recognition across these perceptual differences are unclear. Here, we used multivoxel pattern analysis of fMRI data to identify brain regions that support visual action categorization in a format-independent way. Human participants were scanned while viewing eight categories of interactions (e.g., ) depicted in two visual formats: (1) visually controlled videos of two interacting actors and (2) visually varied photographs selected from the internet involving different actors, objects, and settings. Action category was decodable across visual formats in bilateral inferior parietal, bilateral occipitotemporal, left premotor, and left middle frontal cortex. In most of these regions, the representational similarity of action categories was consistent across subjects and visual formats, a property that can contribute to a common understanding of actions among individuals. These results suggest that the identified brain regions support action category codes that are important for action recognition and action understanding. Humans tend to interpret the observed actions of others in terms of categories that are invariant to incidental features: whether a girl pushes a boy or a button and whether we see it in real-time or in a single snapshot, it is still Here, we investigated the brain systems that facilitate the visual recognition of these action categories across such differences. Using fMRI, we identified several areas of parietal, occipitotemporal, and frontal cortex that exhibit action category codes that are similar across viewing of dynamic videos and still photographs. Our results provide strong evidence for the involvement of these brain regions in recognizing the way that people interact physically with objects and other people.

Citing Articles

Decoding the physics of observed actions in the human brain.

Wurm M, Eriguc D Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39928050 PMC: 11810105. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.98521.


Dissociating goal from outcome during action observation.

Liu S, Wurm M, Caramazza A Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(12).

PMID: 39716740 PMC: 11666468. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae487.


Behaviorally-relevant features of observed actions dominate cortical representational geometry in natural vision.

Han J, Chauhan V, Philip R, Taylor M, Jung H, Halchenko Y Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39678333 PMC: 11643331. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5478816/v1.


Sensitivity and specificity of the action observation network to kinematics, target object, and gesture meaning.

Simonelli F, Handjaras G, Benuzzi F, Bernardi G, Leo A, Duzzi D Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(11):e26762.

PMID: 39037079 PMC: 11261593. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26762.


Asymmetries in encoding event roles: Evidence from language and cognition.

Unal E, Wilson F, Trueswell J, Papafragou A Cognition. 2024; 250:105868.

PMID: 38959638 PMC: 11358469. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105868.


References
1.
Fischl B, Sereno M, Tootell R, Dale A . High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000; 8(4):272-84. PMC: 6873338. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::aid-hbm10>3.0.co;2-4. View

2.
Senior C, Barnes J, Giampietro V, Simmons A, Bullmore E, Brammer M . The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or representational momentum. Curr Biol. 2000; 10(1):16-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)00259-6. View

3.
Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N . Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000; 12(1):48-55. DOI: 10.1162/08989290051137594. View

4.
Grossman E, Donnelly M, Price R, Pickens D, Morgan V, Neighbor G . Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000; 12(5):711-20. DOI: 10.1162/089892900562417. View

5.
Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N . Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science. 2001; 293(5534):1506-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1061133. View