» Articles » PMID: 28209597

Athletic Groin Pain (part 2): a Prospective Cohort Study on the Biomechanical Evaluation of Change of Direction Identifies Three Clusters of Movement Patterns

Overview
Journal Br J Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Feb 18
PMID 28209597
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Athletic groin pain (AGP) is prevalent in sports involving repeated accelerations, decelerations, kicking and change-of-direction movements. Clinical and radiological examinations lack the ability to assess pathomechanics of AGP, but three-dimensional biomechanical movement analysis may be an important innovation.

Aim: The primary aim was to describe and analyse movements used by patients with AGP during a maximum effort change-of-direction task. The secondary aim was to determine if specific anatomical diagnoses were related to a distinct movement strategy.

Methods: 322 athletes with a current symptom of chronic AGP participated. Structured and standardised clinical assessments and radiological examinations were performed on all participants. Additionally, each participant performed multiple repetitions of a planned maximum effort change-of-direction task during which whole body kinematics were recorded. Kinematic and kinetic data were examined using continuous waveform analysis techniques in combination with a subgroup design that used gap statistic and hierarchical clustering.

Results: Three subgroups (clusters) were identified. Kinematic and kinetic measures of the clusters differed strongly in patterns observed in thorax, pelvis, hip, knee and ankle. Cluster 1 (40%) was characterised by increased ankle eversion, external rotation and knee internal rotation and greater knee work. Cluster 2 (15%) was characterised by increased hip flexion, pelvis contralateral drop, thorax tilt and increased hip work. Cluster 3 (45%) was characterised by high ankle dorsiflexion, thorax contralateral drop, ankle work and prolonged ground contact time. No correlation was observed between movement clusters and clinically palpated location of the participant's pain.

Conclusions: We identified three distinct movement strategies among athletes with long-standing groin pain during a maximum effort change-of-direction task These movement strategies were not related to clinical assessment findings but highlighted targets for rehabilitation in response to possible propagative mechanisms.

Trial Registration Number: NCT02437942, pre results.

Citing Articles

Athletes With Adductor-Related Groin Pain: A Narrative Review.

Dinis J, Oliveira J, Choupina B, Seabra Marques P, Sa D, Sarmento A Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e68625.

PMID: 39371738 PMC: 11451080. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68625.


Cleft Sign in MRI May Represent the Disruption of Cartilage Structure within Pubic Symphysis and Pubic Plate: A Cadaver Case Report.

Nishimura H, Gao X, Niga S, Fukase N, Murata Y, Quinn P Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(18).

PMID: 39335777 PMC: 11431435. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14182098.


Evaluating Joint Angle Data for Clinical Assessment Using Multidimensional Inverse Kinematics with Average Segment Morphometry.

Taitano R, Gritsenko V bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39282382 PMC: 11398373. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.03.611088.


Quantitative analysis of the dominant external factors influencing elite speed Skaters' performance using BP neural network.

Yang Z, Ke P, Zhang Y, Du F, Hong P Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1227785.

PMID: 38406767 PMC: 10884308. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1227785.


Running-Related Injury Incidence: Does It Correlate with Kinematic Sub-groups of Runners? A Scoping Review.

Adamson L, Vandamme L, Prior T, Miller S Sports Med. 2024; 54(5):1163-1178.

PMID: 38280179 PMC: 11127823. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-023-01984-0.


References
1.
Falvey E, King E, Kinsella S, Franklyn-Miller A . Athletic groin pain (part 1): a prospective anatomical diagnosis of 382 patients--clinical findings, MRI findings and patient-reported outcome measures at baseline. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 50(7):423-30. PMC: 4819645. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094912. View

2.
Bowman Jr K, Fox J, Sekiya J . A clinically relevant review of hip biomechanics. Arthroscopy. 2010; 26(8):1118-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.01.027. View

3.
Toro B, Nester C, Farren P . Cluster analysis for the extraction of sagittal gait patterns in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2006; 25(2):157-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.02.004. View

4.
Marras W, Ferguson S, Gupta P, Bose S, Parnianpour M, Kim J . The quantification of low back disorder using motion measures. Methodology and validation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(20):2091-100. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199910150-00005. View

5.
Thorborg K, Bandholm T, Petersen J, Weeke K, Weinold C, Andersen B . Hip abduction strength training in the clinical setting: with or without external loading?. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010; 20 Suppl 2:70-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01186.x. View