QSRR Modeling for Metabolite Standards Analyzed by Two Different Chromatographic Columns Using Multiple Linear Regression

Overview

Journal Metabolites

Publisher MDPI

Date 2017 Feb 18

PMID 28208794

Citations 4

Authors

Chrysostomi Zisi

Ioannis Sampsonidis

Stella Fasoula

Konstantinos Papachristos

Michael Witting

Helen G Gika

Panagiotis Nikitas

Adriani Pappa-Louisi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Modified quantitative structure retention relationships (QSRRs) are proposed and applied to describe two retention data sets: A set of 94 metabolites studied by a hydrophilic interaction chromatography system under organic content gradient conditions and a set of tryptophan and its major metabolites analyzed by a reversed-phase chromatographic system under isocratic as well as pH and/or simultaneous pH and organic content gradient conditions. According to the proposed modification, an additional descriptor is added to a conventional QSRR expression, which is the analyte retention time, tR(R), measured under the same elution conditions, but in a second chromatographic column considered as a reference one. The 94 metabolites were studied on an Amide column using a Bare Silica column as a reference. For the second dataset, a Kinetex EVO C18 and a Gemini-NX column were used, where each of them was served as a reference column of the other. We found in all cases a significant improvement of the performance of the QSRR models when the descriptor tR(R) was considered.

Citing Articles

Cross-column density functional theory-based quantitative structure-retention relationship model development powered by machine learning.

Mazraedoost S, Zuvela P, Ulenberg S, Baczek T, Liu J Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024; 416(12):2951-2968.

PMID: 38507043 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-024-05243-7.

Toxicity and Functional Tissue Responses of Two Freshwater Fish after Exposure to Polystyrene Microplastics.

Kaloyianni M, Bobori D, Xanthopoulou D, Malioufa G, Sampsonidis I, Kalogiannis S Toxics. 2021; 9(11).

PMID: 34822680 PMC: 8625933. DOI: 10.3390/toxics9110289.

Chemical Characterization of Volatiles from Serbia.

Acimovic M, Ivanovic S, Simic K, Pezo L, Zeremski T, Ovuka J Plants (Basel). 2021; 10(3).

PMID: 33806732 PMC: 8004588. DOI: 10.3390/plants10030600.

Modelling of Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography Stationary Phases Using Chemometric Approaches.

Navarro-Reig M, Ortiz-Villanueva E, Tauler R, Jaumot J Metabolites. 2017; 7(4).

PMID: 29064436 PMC: 5746734. DOI: 10.3390/metabo7040054.

References

DArchivio A, Maggi M, Ruggieri F . Multiple-column RP-HPLC retention modelling based on solvatochromic or theoretical solute descriptors. J Sep Sci. 2010; 33(2):155-66. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200900537. View

DArchivio A, Maggi M, Mazzeo P, Ruggieri F . Artificial neural network modelling of retention of pesticides in various octadecylsiloxane-bonded reversed-phase columns and water-acetonitrile mobile phase. Anal Chim Acta. 2009; 646(1-2):47-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.05.019. View

Akbar J, Iqbal S, Batool F, Karim A, Chan K . Predicting retention times of naturally occurring phenolic compounds in reversed-phase liquid chromatography: a Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationship (QSRR) approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2012; 13(11):15387-400. PMC: 3509648. DOI: 10.3390/ijms131115387. View

Baczek T, Walijewski L, Kaliszan R . pH gradient reversed-phase liquid chromatography as a fractionation tool for the separation of peptides. Talanta. 2008; 75(1):76-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.10.031. View

Bodzioch K, Baczek T, Kaliszan R, Vander Heyden Y . The molecular descriptor logSumAA and its alternatives in QSRR models to predict the retention of peptides. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008; 50(4):563-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.09.004. View

Ghavami R, Sepehri B . Investigation of retention behavior of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners on 18 different HRGC columns using molecular surface average local ionization energy descriptors. J Chromatogr A. 2012; 1233:116-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.01.047. View

Gorynski K, Bojko B, Nowaczyk A, Bucinski A, Pawliszyn J, Kaliszan R . Quantitative structure-retention relationships models for prediction of high performance liquid chromatography retention time of small molecules: endogenous metabolites and banned compounds. Anal Chim Acta. 2013; 797:13-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.08.025. View

DArchivio A, Giannitto A, Maggi M . Cross-column prediction of gas-chromatographic retention of polybrominated diphenyl ethers. J Chromatogr A. 2013; 1298:118-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.05.018. View

Michel M, Baczek T, Studzinska S, Bodzioch K, Jonsson T, Kaliszan R . Comparative evaluation of high-performance liquid chromatography stationary phases used for the separation of peptides in terms of quantitative structure-retention relationships. J Chromatogr A. 2007; 1175(1):49-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.10.002. View

10.

Acevedo-Martinez J, Escalona-Arranz J, Villar-Rojas A, Tellez-Palmero F, Perez-Roses R, Gonzalez L . Quantitative study of the structure-retention index relationship in the imine family. J Chromatogr A. 2005; 1102(1-2):238-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.10.019. View

11.

Noorizadeh H, Farmany A . Quantitative structure-retention relationship for retention behavior of organic pollutants in textile wastewaters and landfill leachate in LC-APCI-MS. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2011; 19(4):1252-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0650-x. View

12.

Randazzo G, Tonoli D, Hambye S, Guillarme D, Jeanneret F, Nurisso A . Prediction of retention time in reversed-phase liquid chromatography as a tool for steroid identification. Anal Chim Acta. 2016; 916:8-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.02.014. View

13.

Wiczling P, J Markuszewski M, Kaliszan M, Kaliszan R . pH/organic solvent double-gradient reversed-phase HPLC. Anal Chem. 2005; 77(2):449-58. DOI: 10.1021/ac049092r. View

14.

Creek D, Jankevics A, Breitling R, Watson D, Barrett M, Burgess K . Toward global metabolomics analysis with hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: improved metabolite identification by retention time prediction. Anal Chem. 2011; 83(22):8703-10. DOI: 10.1021/ac2021823. View

15.

Boudah S, Olivier M, Aros-Calt S, Oliveira L, Fenaille F, Tabet J . Annotation of the human serum metabolome by coupling three liquid chromatography methods to high-resolution mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014; 966:34-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.04.025. View

16.

Yan J, Cao D, Guo F, Zhang L, He M, Huang J . Comparison of quantitative structure-retention relationship models on four stationary phases with different polarity for a diverse set of flavor compounds. J Chromatogr A. 2012; 1223:118-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.12.020. View

17.

Bodzioch K, Durand A, Kaliszan R, Baczek T, Vander Heyden Y . Advanced QSRR modeling of peptides behavior in RPLC. Talanta. 2010; 81(4-5):1711-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.03.028. View

18.

Cirera-Domenech E, Estrada-Tejedor R, Broto-Puig F, Teixido J, Gassiot-Matas M, Comellas L . Quantitative structure-retention relationships applied to liquid chromatography gradient elution method for the determination of carbonyl-2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone compounds. J Chromatogr A. 2013; 1276:65-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.12.027. View

19.

Cao M, Fraser K, Huege J, Featonby T, Rasmussen S, Jones C . Predicting retention time in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and its use for peak annotation in metabolomics. Metabolomics. 2015; 11(3):696-706. PMC: 4419193. DOI: 10.1007/s11306-014-0727-x. View