» Articles » PMID: 28207800

Perception-production Relations in Later Development of American English Rhotics

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Feb 17
PMID 28207800
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is known that some adult listeners have more sharply defined perceptual categories than others, and listeners with more precise auditory targets are also more precise in their production of contrasts. There is additionally evidence that children who have not yet mastered production of a contrast show diminished performance on perceptual measures of the same contrast. To date, however, few studies have investigated developmental perception-production relations using the fine-grained measures typical of adult studies. Existing evidence suggests that perception and production can be closely connected in development, but this relationship may break down as perception and articulation mature at different rates. This study evaluated perception and production of the English /r-w/ contrast in 40 typically-developing children aged 9-14. Perceptual sensitivity was measured with a logistic function fitted over responses in a forced-choice identification task using two synthetic 10-step continua from rake to wake. Participants also produced rhotic and non-rhotic words. Across participants, there was a significant correlation between perceptual acuity and rhoticity in production, although this effect was only observed for one of two continua tested. These results provide preliminary evidence compatible with the hypothesis that children with a more refined auditory target for a sound also produce that sound more accurately.

Citing Articles

Consonant aspiration in Mandarin-speaking children: a developmental perspective from perception and production.

Li Y, Li Q, Du Y, Wang L, Li L, Wen J Front Pediatr. 2025; 12:1465454.

PMID: 39882208 PMC: 11776868. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1465454.


What R Mandarin Chinese /ɹ/s? - acoustic and articulatory features of Mandarin Chinese rhotics.

Chen S, Whalen D, Mok P Phonetica. 2024; 81(5):509-552.

PMID: 39279469 PMC: 11449382. DOI: 10.1515/phon-2023-0023.


When Jack isn't Jacques: Simultaneous opposite language-specific speech perceptual learning in French-English bilinguals.

Caudrelier T, Menard L, Beausoleil M, Martin C, Samuel A PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(9):pgae354.

PMID: 39246670 PMC: 11378075. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae354.


Comparing online versus laboratory measures of speech perception in older children and adolescents.

McAllister T, Preston J, Ochs L, Hill J, Hitchcock E PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0297530.

PMID: 38324559 PMC: 10849252. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297530.


Auditory and Somatosensory Development for Speech in Later Childhood.

Ayala S, Eads A, Kabakoff H, Swartz M, Shiller D, Hill J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023; 66(4):1252-1273.

PMID: 36930986 PMC: 10187971. DOI: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00496.


References
1.
McGowan R, Nittrouer S, Manning C . Development of [j] in young, midwestern, American children. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 115(2):871-84. PMC: 3987658. DOI: 10.1121/1.1642624. View

2.
Callan D, Kent R, Guenther F, Vorperian H . An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000; 43(3):721-36. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4303.721. View

3.
Blomert L, Mitterer H, Paffen C . In search of the auditory, phonetic, and/or phonological problems in dyslexia: context effects in speech perception. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47(5):1030-47. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/077). View

4.
Tourville J, Reilly K, Guenther F . Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech. Neuroimage. 2007; 39(3):1429-43. PMC: 3658624. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.054. View

5.
Boyce S . The Articulatory Phonetics of /r/ for Residual Speech Errors. Semin Speech Lang. 2015; 36(4):257-70. PMC: 4915106. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1562909. View