» Articles » PMID: 28207540

Different Dosages of Mifepristone Versus Enantone to Treat Uterine Fibroids: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Feb 17
PMID 28207540
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 10 mg and 25 mg mifepristone per day compared with 3.75 mg enantone in treating uterine fibroids.

Methods: This is a Multicenter randomized controlled trial. A total of 501 subjects with symptomatic uterine fibroids were enrolled and randomized into the group of 10mg, 25mg mifepristone and 3.75 enantone (with 307, 102 and 92 subjects respectively), with 458 subjects completed the treatment. Three months of daily therapy with oral mifepristone (at a dose of either 10 mg or 25 mg) or once-monthly subcutaneous injections of enantone (at a dose of 3.75 mg) were used. Change in volume of the largest uterine fibroid was the primary efficacy variable, and secondary efficacy variables included changes in anemia and relevant symptom. Safety evaluation included the analyses of adverse events, laboratory values, and relevant endometrial changes.

Results: After three months of treatment, the mean volume of the largest leiomyoma was significantly reduced by mifepristone 10 mg or 25 mg or enantone 3.75 mg (40.27%, 42.59% and 44.49% respectively) (P < 0.0001). Percentage change from baseline in largest leiomyoma volume was not statistically significant among the three groups (P = 0.1057). Most of the patients in all groups experienced amenorrhea after the treatment. There were also significant elevations in red blood cell count, hemoglobin and hematocrit (P < 0.0001), and significant reductions in prevalence of dysmenorrhea, pelvic pressure, non-menstrual abdominal pain (P < 0.0001) in each group, while no significant difference among the three groups.All study medications are well-tolerated, and no serious adverse event was reported. Treatment-related adverse event rate was significantly lower in mifepristone 10 mg group, compared to Enantone 3.75 mg group (13.59% vs. 32.58%, P = 0.0002). In both mifepristone groups, estradiol levels were maintained in the premenopausal range, whereas patients in the enantone group had a significant reduction to postmenopausal levels (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: 10mg is as effective as 25mg mifepristone and 3.75 mg enantone with minimal drug-related side effects, and may provide an alternative for clinical application, especially for patient who are in perimenopause with uterine fibroids.

Citing Articles

Multiple Clinical Indications of Mifepristone: A Systematic Review.

Mathew S, Ticsa M, Qadir S, Rezene A, Khanna D Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e48372.

PMID: 38060710 PMC: 10698292. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48372.


Mifepristone in Fibroids: Comparative Study of Safety and Efficacy of Biweekly Dosage Vs Daily Dosage Schedule.

Shaikh N, Mehra R, Goel P, Kaur R J Midlife Health. 2021; 12(1):39-45.

PMID: 34188425 PMC: 8189336. DOI: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_90_20.


Association between vitamin D and uterine fibroids: a study protocol of an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Sheng B, Song Y, Liu Y, Jiang C, Zhu X BMJ Open. 2020; 10(11):e038709.

PMID: 33158822 PMC: 7651728. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038709.


A prospective interventional study to evaluate the effects of medical therapy (Mifepristone 25 mg) on the management of uterine fibroids.

Gupta M, Jamwal N, Sabharwal S, Sobti S J Family Med Prim Care. 2020; 9(7):3230-3235.

PMID: 33102275 PMC: 7567249. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_467_20.


Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese herbal formula combined with western medicine for uterine fibroid: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fu Y, Fan Y, Fan W, Lv Y, Ai S, Yu C Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(36):e22039.

PMID: 32899062 PMC: 7478476. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022039.


References
1.
Esteve J, Acosta R, Perez Y, Campos R, Hernandez A, Texido C . Treatment of uterine myoma with 5 or 10mg mifepristone daily during 6 months, post-treatment evolution over 12 months: double-blind randomised clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012; 161(2):202-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.12.018. View

2.
Murphy A, Kettel L, Morales A, Roberts V, Yen S . Regression of uterine leiomyomata in response to the antiprogesterone RU 486. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993; 76(2):513-7. DOI: 10.1210/jcem.76.2.8432797. View

3.
Eisinger S, Meldrum S, Fiscella K, le Roux H, Guzick D . Low-dose mifepristone for uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101(2):243-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02511-5. View

4.
Reinsch R, Murphy A, Morales A, Yen S . The effects of RU 486 and leuprolide acetate on uterine artery blood flow in the fibroid uterus: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170(6):1623-7; discussion 1627-8. View

5.
Salle B, Sergeant P, Awada A, Bied-Damon V, Gaucherand P, Boisson C . Transvaginal ultrasound studies of vascular and morphological changes in uteri exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11(11):2531-6. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019153. View