» Articles » PMID: 28207058

Competition Between Cyanobacteria and Green Algae at Low Versus Elevated CO2: Who Will Win, and Why?

Overview
Journal J Exp Bot
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Feb 17
PMID 28207058
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traditionally, it has often been hypothesized that cyanobacteria are superior competitors at low CO2 and high pH in comparison with eukaryotic algae, owing to their effective CO2-concentrating mechanism (CCM). However, recent work indicates that green algae can also have a sophisticated CCM tuned to low CO2 levels. Conversely, cyanobacteria with the high-flux bicarbonate uptake system BicA appear well adapted to high inorganic carbon concentrations. To investigate these ideas we studied competition between three species of green algae and a bicA strain of the harmful cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa at low (100 ppm) and high (2000 ppm) CO2. Two of the green algae were competitively superior to the cyanobacterium at low CO2, whereas the cyanobacterium increased its competitive ability with respect to the green algae at high CO2. The experiments were supported by a resource competition model linking the population dynamics of the phytoplankton species with dynamic changes in carbon speciation, pH and light. Our results show (i) that competition between phytoplankton species at different CO2 levels can be predicted from species traits in monoculture, (ii) that green algae can be strong competitors under CO2-depleted conditions, and (iii) that bloom-forming cyanobacteria with high-flux bicarbonate uptake systems will benefit from elevated CO2 concentrations.

Citing Articles

An examination of protist diversity in serpentinization-hosted ecosystems of the Samail Ophiolite of Oman.

Howells A, De Martini F, Gile G, Shock E Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1139333.

PMID: 37213519 PMC: 10192764. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1139333.


Biocement from the ocean: Hybrid microbial-electrochemical mineralization of CO.

Kludze A, Solanki D, Lejeune M, Yanagi R, Ishii M, Raychaudhuri N iScience. 2022; 25(10):105156.

PMID: 36212025 PMC: 9535420. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105156.


Preference of carbon absorption determines the competitive ability of algae along atmospheric CO concentration.

Zhou Q, Gao Y, Hou J, Wang T, Tang L Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(7):e9079.

PMID: 35845373 PMC: 9274100. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9079.


Methane-Derived Carbon as a Driver for Cyanobacterial Growth.

Cerbin S, Perez G, Rybak M, Wejnerowski L, Konowalczyk A, Helmsing N Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:837198.

PMID: 35432228 PMC: 9010870. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.837198.


Phytoplankton Composition and Their Related Factors in Five Different Lakes in China: Implications for Lake Management.

Jia J, Chen Q, Ren H, Lu R, He H, Gu P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(5).

PMID: 35270826 PMC: 8910358. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19053135.


References
1.
Engel B, Schaffer M, Kuhn Cuellar L, Villa E, Plitzko J, Baumeister W . Native architecture of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast revealed by in situ cryo-electron tomography. Elife. 2015; 4. PMC: 4292175. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.04889. View

2.
Meyer M, Griffiths H . Origins and diversity of eukaryotic CO2-concentrating mechanisms: lessons for the future. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64(3):769-86. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers390. View

3.
Mora C, Witt F, Aparicio P, Quinones M . Independent induction of two blue light-dependent monovalent anion transport systems in the plasma membrane of Monoraphidium braunii. J Exp Bot. 2002; 53(376):1909-18. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erf056. View

4.
Price G, Badger M, Woodger F, Long B . Advances in understanding the cyanobacterial CO2-concentrating-mechanism (CCM): functional components, Ci transporters, diversity, genetic regulation and prospects for engineering into plants. J Exp Bot. 2007; 59(7):1441-61. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm112. View

5.
Beardall J, Giordano M . Ecological implications of microalgal and cyanobacterial CO2 concentrating mechanisms, and their regulation. Funct Plant Biol. 2020; 29(3):335-347. DOI: 10.1071/PP01195. View