» Articles » PMID: 28203412

Predictive Models of Malignant Transudative Pleural Effusions

Abstract

Background: There are no firm recommendations when cytology should be performed in pleural transudates, since some malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) behave biochemically as transudates. The objective was to assess when would be justified to perform cytology on pleural transudates.

Methods: Consecutive patients with transudative pleural effusion (PE) were enrolled and divided in two groups: malignant and non-MPE. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the probability of malignancy. Two prognostic models were considered: (I) clinical-radiological variables; and (II) combination of clinical-radiological and analytical variables. Calibration and discrimination [receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC)] were performed.

Results: A total of 281 pleural transudates were included: 26 malignant and 255 non-malignant. The AUC obtained with Model 1 (left PE, radiological images compatible with malignancy, absence of dyspnea, and serosanguinous appearance of the fluid), and Model 2 (the variables of Model 1 plus CEA) were 0.973 and 0.995, respectively. Although no false negatives are found in Models 1 and 2 to probabilities of 11% and 14%, respectively, by applying bootstrapping techniques to not find false negatives in 95% of other possible samples would require lowering the cut-off points for the aforementioned probabilities to 3% (Model 1) and 4% (Model 2), respectively. The false positive results are 32 (Model 1) and 18 (Model 2), with no false negatives.

Conclusions: The applied models have a high discriminative ability to predict when a transudative PE may be of neoplastic origin, being superior to adding an analytical variable to the clinic-radiological variables.

Citing Articles

Clinical overview of the physiology and pathophysiology of pleural fluid movement: a narrative review.

Ferreiro L, Toubes M, Suarez-Antelo J, Rodriguez-Nunez N, Valdes L ERJ Open Res. 2024; 10(5).

PMID: 39351376 PMC: 11440405. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00050-2024.


Cardiac related pleural effusions: a narrative review.

Wijayaratne T, Yousuf A, Panchal R J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(2):1674-1686.

PMID: 38505011 PMC: 10944777. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1731.


Transudative Malignancy: Uncommon and Real.

Cardenas Ramos L, Batra S, Kyung K, Farhan M Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e39944.

PMID: 37409213 PMC: 10319445. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39944.


Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Decade in Review.

Jacobs B, Sheikh G, Youness H, Keddissi J, Abdo T Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35454064 PMC: 9030780. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12041016.


Development of risk prediction models for lung cancer based on tumor markers and radiological signs.

Tu Y, Wu Y, Lu Y, Bi X, Chen T J Clin Lab Anal. 2020; 35(3):e23682.

PMID: 33325592 PMC: 7957970. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23682.


References
1.
Valdes L, Alvarez D, San Jose E, Penela P, Valle J, Suarez J . Tuberculous pleurisy: a study of 254 patients. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158(18):2017-21. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.18.2017. View

2.
Liang Q, Shi H, Qin X, Liang X, Jiang J, Yang H . Diagnostic accuracy of tumour markers for malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis. Thorax. 2007; 63(1):35-41. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2007.077958. View

3.
Assi Z, Caruso J, Herndon J, Patz Jr E . Cytologically proved malignant pleural effusions: distribution of transudates and exudates. Chest. 1998; 113(5):1302-4. DOI: 10.1378/chest.113.5.1302. View

4.
Decker D, DINES D, Payne W, BERNATZ P, Pairolero P . The significance of a cytologically negative pleural effusion in bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest. 1978; 74(6):640-2. DOI: 10.1378/chest.74.6.640. View

5.
Teklu B . Cytology on transudative pleural effusions. Chest. 1999; 116(3):846-7. DOI: 10.1378/chest.116.3.846. View