» Articles » PMID: 28202031

Making Sense of Complexity in Context and Implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Feb 17
PMID 28202031
Citations 349
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of complex interventions, as well as their success in reaching relevant populations, is critically influenced by their implementation in a given context. Current conceptual frameworks often fail to address context and implementation in an integrated way and, where addressed, they tend to focus on organisational context and are mostly concerned with specific health fields. Our objective was to develop a framework to facilitate the structured and comprehensive conceptualisation and assessment of context and implementation of complex interventions.

Methods: The Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework was developed in an iterative manner and underwent extensive application. An initial framework based on a scoping review was tested in rapid assessments, revealing inconsistencies with respect to the underlying concepts. Thus, pragmatic utility concept analysis was undertaken to advance the concepts of context and implementation. Based on these findings, the framework was revised and applied in several systematic reviews, one health technology assessment (HTA) and one applicability assessment of very different complex interventions. Lessons learnt from these applications and from peer review were incorporated, resulting in the CICI framework.

Results: The CICI framework comprises three dimensions-context, implementation and setting-which interact with one another and with the intervention dimension. Context comprises seven domains (i.e., geographical, epidemiological, socio-cultural, socio-economic, ethical, legal, political); implementation consists of five domains (i.e., implementation theory, process, strategies, agents and outcomes); setting refers to the specific physical location, in which the intervention is put into practise. The intervention and the way it is implemented in a given setting and context can occur on a micro, meso and macro level. Tools to operationalise the framework comprise a checklist, data extraction tools for qualitative and quantitative reviews and a consultation guide for applicability assessments.

Conclusions: The CICI framework addresses and graphically presents context, implementation and setting in an integrated way. It aims at simplifying and structuring complexity in order to advance our understanding of whether and how interventions work. The framework can be applied in systematic reviews and HTA as well as primary research and facilitate communication among teams of researchers and with various stakeholders.

Citing Articles

Assessing the readiness and feasibility to implement a model of care for spine disorders and related disability in Cross Lake, an Indigenous community in northern Manitoba, Canada: a research protocol.

Bussieres A, Passmore S, Kopansky-Giles D, Tavares P, Ward J, Ladwig J Chiropr Man Therap. 2025; 33(1):12.

PMID: 40082975 PMC: 11908001. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00576-1.


Addressing health equity during design and implementation of health system reform initiatives: a scoping review and framework.

Bouckley T, Peiris D, Nambiar D, Mishra S, Sood T, Purwar P Int J Equity Health. 2025; 24(1):68.

PMID: 40069696 PMC: 11899096. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02436-z.


A global framework for integrating public health into wellbeing: why a public wellbeing system is needed.

Lippai L, Tarko K, Tanyi A, Kollanyi Z, Arapovics M, Vitrai J Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1454470.

PMID: 39980909 PMC: 11841494. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1454470.


Developing and implementing a nurse-delivered and a web-based dyadic psychoeducational program for people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers: sharing experiences from a three-arm international randomized controlled trial (DIAdIC).

De Vleminck A, Van Goethem V, Dierickx S, Matthys O, Beernaert K, Gronvold M Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025; 19:26323524241310458.

PMID: 39968193 PMC: 11833810. DOI: 10.1177/26323524241310458.


Protocol for a Field Trial of a Hearing and Vision Support Intervention for People Living in Long-Term Care in Australia.

Meyer C, El-Saifi N, Rose N, Bail K, Browning C, Cenin D Health Expect. 2025; 28(1):e70175.

PMID: 39930844 PMC: 11811395. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70175.


References
1.
May C, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S . Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:29. PMC: 2693517. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29. View

2.
Burns J, Boogaard H, Polus S, Pfadenhauer L, Rohwer A, van Erp A . Interventions to reduce ambient particulate matter air pollution and their effect on health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 5:CD010919. PMC: 6526394. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010919.pub2. View

3.
McCormack B, Kitson A, Harvey G, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Seers K . Getting evidence into practice: the meaning of 'context'. J Adv Nurs. 2002; 38(1):94-104. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02150.x. View

4.
Rohwer A, Pfadenhauer L, Burns J, Brereton L, Gerhardus A, Booth A . Series: Clinical Epidemiology in South Africa. Paper 3: Logic models help make sense of complexity in systematic reviews and health technology assessments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 83:37-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.06.012. View

5.
Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Scammon D, Waitzman N, Cronholm P, Halladay J, Driscoll D . Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med. 2013; 11 Suppl 1:S115-23. PMC: 3707255. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1549. View