» Articles » PMID: 28199137

Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated with Interhospital Transfer for Adults with Ventilator-Dependent Respiratory Failure

Overview
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2017 Feb 16
PMID 28199137
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Patients with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure have improved outcomes at centers with greater expertise; yet, most patients are not treated in such facilities. Efforts to align care for respiratory failure and hospital capability would necessarily require interhospital transfer.

Objectives: To characterize the prevalence and the patient and hospital factors associated with interhospital transfer of adults residing in Florida with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure.

Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational study using Florida Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data. We selected patients 18 years of age and older with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes of respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation during 2012 and 2013, and we identified cohorts of patients that did and did not undergo interhospital transfer. We obtained patient sociodemographic and clinical variables and categorized hospitals into subtypes on the basis of patient volume and services provided: large, medium (nonprofit or for-profit), and small.

Results: Interhospital transfer was our primary outcome measure. Patient sociodemographics, clinical variables, and hospital types were used as covariates. We identified 2,580 patients with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure who underwent interhospital transfer. Overall, transfer was uncommon, with only 2.9% of patients being transferred. In a hierarchical model, age less than 65 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77-2.45) and tracheostomy (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 2.80-3.65) were associated with higher odds of transfer, whereas having Medicaid was associated with lower odds of transfer than having commercial insurance (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.75). Additionally, care in medium-sized for-profit hospitals was associated with lower odds of transfer (OR, 1.37 vs. 2.70) than care in medium nonprofit hospitals, despite similar hospital characteristics.

Conclusions: In Florida, interhospital transfer of patients with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure is uncommon and more likely among younger, commercially insured, medically resource-intensive patients. For-profit hospitals are less likely to transfer than nonprofit hospitals. In future studies, researchers should test for geographic variations and examine the clinical implications of selectivity in interhospital transfer of patients with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure.

Citing Articles

Interhospital Transfer of Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure in the United States: A Scoping Review.

Ludwig A, Slota J, Nunes D, Vranas K, Kruser J, Scott K Crit Care Explor. 2024; 6(7):e1120.

PMID: 38968159 PMC: 11230760. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001120.


Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated With the Interhospital Transfer of Adult Patients With Sepsis.

Ofoma U, Lanter T, Deych E, Kollef M, Wan F, Joynt Maddox K Crit Care Explor. 2023; 5(12):e1009.

PMID: 38046937 PMC: 10688774. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001009.


The Relationship Between Hospital Capability and Mortality in Sepsis: Development of a Sepsis-Related Hospital Capability Index.

Ofoma U, Deych E, Mohr N, Walkey A, Kollef M, Wan F Crit Care Med. 2023; 51(11):1479-1491.

PMID: 37338282 PMC: 10615795. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005973.


Evaluation of factors associated with interhospital transfers to pediatric and adult tertiary level of care: A study of acute neurological disease cases.

Iacob S, Wang Y, Peterson S, Ivankovic S, Bhole S, Tracy P PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0279031.

PMID: 36516150 PMC: 9749979. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279031.


The Impact of Timing on Clinical and Economic Outcomes During Inter-ICU Transfer of Acute Respiratory Failure Patients: Time and Tide Wait for No One.

Nadig N, Brinton D, Simpson K, Goodwin A, Simpson A, Ford D Crit Care Explor. 2022; 4(3):e0642.

PMID: 35261978 PMC: 8893307. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000642.


References
1.
Hamel M, Lynn J, Teno J, Covinsky K, Wu A, Galanos A . Age-related differences in care preferences, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes of seriously ill hospitalized adults: lessons from SUPPORT. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48(S1):S176-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03129.x. View

2.
Glance L, Li Y, Osler T, Dick A, Mukamel D . Impact of patient volume on the mortality rate of adult intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34(7):1925-34. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000226415.93237.84. View

3.
Lasswell S, Barfield W, Rochat R, Blackmon L . Perinatal regionalization for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010; 304(9):992-1000. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1226. View

4.
Garg P, Frick K, Diener-West M, Powe N . Effect of the ownership of dialysis facilities on patients' survival and referral for transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(22):1653-60. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199911253412205. View

5.
Unroe M, Kahn J, Carson S, Govert J, Martinu T, Sathy S . One-year trajectories of care and resource utilization for recipients of prolonged mechanical ventilation: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153(3):167-75. PMC: 2941154. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00007. View