» Articles » PMID: 28196952

Revalidation and Quality Assurance: the Application of the MUSIQ Framework in Independent Verification Visits to Healthcare Organisations

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Feb 16
PMID 28196952
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We present a national evaluation of the impact of independent verification visits (IVVs) performed by National Health Service (NHS) England as part of quality assuring medical revalidation. Organisational visits are central to NHS quality assurance. They are costly, yet little empirical research evidence exists concerning their impact, and what does exist is conflicting.

Setting: The focus was on healthcare providers in the NHS (in secondary care) and private sector across England, who were designated bodies (DBs). DBs are healthcare organisations that have a statutory responsibility, via the lead clinician, the responsible officer (RO), to implement medical revalidation.

Participants: All ROs who had undergone an IVV in England in 2014 and 2015 were invited to participate. 46 ROs were interviewed. Ethnographic data were gathered at 18 observations of the IVVs and 20 IVV post visit reports underwent documentary analysis.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes were the findings pertaining to the effectiveness of the IVV system in supporting the revalidation processes at the DBs. Secondary outcomes were methodological, relating to the Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ) and how its application to the IVV reveals the relevance of contextual factors described in the model.

Results: The impact of the IVVs varied by DB according to three major themes: the personal context of the RO; the organisational context of the DB; and the visit and its impact. ROs were largely satisfied with visits which raised the status of appraisal within their organisations. Inadequate or untimely feedback was associated with dissatisfaction.

Conclusions: Influencing teams whose prime responsibility is establishing processes and evaluating progress was crucial for internal quality improvement. Visits acted as a nudge, generating internal quality review, which was reinforced by visit teams with relevant expertise. Diverse team membership, knowledge transfer and timely feedback made visits more impactful.

Citing Articles

Impact of practicing internal benchmarking on continuous improvement of cataract surgery outcomes: a retrospective observational study at Aravind Eye Hospitals, India.

Balu G, Gupta S, Ravilla R, Ravilla T, Mertens H, Webers C BMJ Open. 2023; 13(6):e071860.

PMID: 37349104 PMC: 10314652. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071860.


Protocol for an integrated evaluation framework to study training, curricular and contextual factors impacting the success of a measurement for improvement training programme for healthcare staff in Ireland.

Khurshid Z, De Brun A, McAuliffe E BMJ Open. 2022; 12(2):e047639.

PMID: 35149560 PMC: 8845174. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047639.


Ethiopian Pediatric Society Quality Improvement Initiative: a pragmatic approach to facility-based quality improvement in low-resource settings.

Patterson J, Worku B, Jones D, Clary A, Ramaswamy R, Bose C BMJ Open Qual. 2021; 10(1).

PMID: 33436379 PMC: 7805350. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000927.


Defining and assessing context in healthcare implementation studies: a systematic review.

Rogers L, De Brun A, McAuliffe E BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):591.

PMID: 32600396 PMC: 7322847. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05212-7.


Realist evaluation of UK medical education quality assurance.

Crampton P, Mehdizadeh L, Page M, Knight L, Griffin A BMJ Open. 2020; 9(12):e033614.

PMID: 31888940 PMC: 6937024. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033614.

References
1.
Mumford V, Forde K, Greenfield D, Hinchcliff R, Braithwaite J . Health services accreditation: what is the evidence that the benefits justify the costs?. Int J Qual Health Care. 2013; 25(5):606-20. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt059. View

2.
Southgate L, Pringle M . Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice. BMJ. 1999; 319(7218):1180-3. PMC: 1116961. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7218.1180. View

3.
Kaplan H, Provost L, Froehle C, Margolis P . The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 21(1):13-20. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000010. View

4.
Ovretveit J, Gustafson D . Evaluation of quality improvement programmes. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11(3):270-5. PMC: 1743631. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.270. View

5.
Hinchcliff R, Greenfield D, Moldovan M, Westbrook J, Pawsey M, Mumford V . Narrative synthesis of health service accreditation literature. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21(12):979-91. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000852. View