» Articles » PMID: 28194522

A Prospective Multi-institutional Validity Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Clinical Diagnosis of Pathological Stage III Gastric Cancer (JCOG1302A)

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical surgery is a promising strategy to improve survival of patients with stage III gastric cancer, but is associated with the risk of preoperative overdiagnosis by which patients with early disease may receive unnecessary intensive chemotherapy.

Methods: We assessed the validity of a preoperative diagnostic criterion in a prospective multicenter study. Patients with gastric cancer with a clinical diagnosis of T2/T3/T4, M0, except for diffuse large tumors and extensive bulky nodal disease, were eligible. Prospectively recorded clinical diagnoses (cT category, cN category) were compared with postoperative pathological diagnoses (pT category, pN category, and pathological stage). The primary endpoint was the proportion of pathological stage I tumors among those diagnosed as cT3/T4, which we expected to be 5% or less.

Results: Data from 1260 patients enrolled from 53 institutions were analyzed. The proportion of pathological stage I tumors in those with a diagnosis of cT3/T4 (primary endpoint) was 12.3%, which was much higher than the prespecified value. The positive predictive value and the sensitivity for pathological stage III tumors were 43.6% and 87.8% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced CT for lymph node metastasis were 62.5% and 65.7% respectively. After exploring several diagnostic criteria, we propose, for future NAC trials in Japan, a diagnosis of "cT3/T4 with cN1/N2/N3," by which inclusion of pathological stage I tumors was reduced to 6.5%, although its sensitivity for pathological stage III tumors decreased to 64.5%.

Conclusion: Clinical diagnosis of T3/T4 tumors was not an optimal criterion to select patients for intensive NAC trials because more than 10% of patients with pathological stage I disease were included. We propose the criterion "cT3/T4 and cN1/N2/N3" instead.

Citing Articles

Dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.

Zhou Y, Chen X, Zhang X, Pu H, Li H BMC Gastroenterol. 2025; 25(1):123.

PMID: 40021977 PMC: 11869644. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-025-03728-y.


Cost-effectiveness of open vs. laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer in China.

Lai M, Li Y, Lan N, Yuan W Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6714.

PMID: 40000698 PMC: 11861295. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91003-1.


WTAP-Mediated N6-Methyladenosine Modification Promotes Gastric Cancer Progression by Regulating MAP2K6 Expression.

Han S, Jiang H, Wang J, Li C, Liu T, Xuan M J Cancer. 2025; 16(5):1420-1437.

PMID: 39991580 PMC: 11843227. DOI: 10.7150/jca.98559.


Integrating Machine Learning and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) Framework to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer Patients Based on Inflammation Indices and Peripheral Lymphocyte Subpopulations.

Zhu Z, Wang C, Shi L, Li M, Li J, Liang S J Inflamm Res. 2024; 17:9551-9566.

PMID: 39606641 PMC: 11600934. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S488676.


Oncological long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for cT3-4 gastric cancer at surgical staging: a propensity-score matched cohort study.

Manuel A, Kinoshita T, Amini N, Akimoto E, Yura M, Yoshida M Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(11):6682-6690.

PMID: 39317910 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11287-8.


References
1.
Yada T, Yokoi C, Uemura N . The current state of diagnosis and treatment for early gastric cancer. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013; 2013:241320. PMC: 3600289. DOI: 10.1155/2013/241320. View

2.
Tsuburaya A, Mizusawa J, Tanaka Y, Fukushima N, Nashimoto A, Sasako M . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin followed by D2 gastrectomy with para-aortic lymph node dissection for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis. Br J Surg. 2014; 101(6):653-60. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9484. View

3.
. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14(2):113-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4. View

4.
Matsumoto Y, Yanai H, Tokiyama H, Nishiaki M, Higaki S, Okita K . Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis of submucosal invasion in early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol. 2000; 35(5):326-31. DOI: 10.1007/s005350050356. View

5.
Shimada H, Okazumi S, Koyama M, Murakami K . Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Task Force for Research Promotion: clinical utility of ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gastric cancer. A systematic review of the literature. Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0017-5. View