» Articles » PMID: 28194490

Ranula: Current Concept of Pathophysiologic Basis and Surgical Management Options

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 Feb 15
PMID 28194490
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is no consensus opinion on a definitive surgical management option for ranulas to curtail recurrence, largely from the existing gap in knowledge on the pathophysiologic basis.

Aim: To highlight the current scientific basis of ranula development that informed the preferred surgical approach.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Public Tertiary Academic Health Institution.

Method: A 7-year 7-month study of ranulas surgically managed at our tertiary health institution was undertaken-June 1, 2008-December 31, 2015-from case files retrieved utilising the ICD-10 version 10 standard codes.

Results: Twelve cases, representing 0.4 and 1.2% of all institutional and ENT operations, respectively, were managed for ranulas with a M:F = 1:1. The ages ranged from 5/12 to 39 years, mean = 18.5 years, and the disease was prevalent in the third decade of life. Main presentation in the under-fives was related to airway and feeding compromise, while in adults, cosmetic facial appearance. Ranulas in adults were plunging (n = 8, 58.3%), left-sided save one with M:F = 2:1. All were unilateral with R:L = 1:2. Treatment included aspiration (n = 2, 16.7%) with 100% recurrence, intra-/extraoral excision of ranula only (n = 4, 33.3%) with recurrence rate of 50% (n = 2, 16.7%), while marsupialisation in children (n = 1, 8.3%) had no recurrence. Similarly, transcervical approach (n = 5, 41.7%) with excision of both the ranula/sublingual salivary gland recorded zero recurrence. Recurrence was the main complication (n = 4, 33.3%).

Conclusion: With the current knowledge on the pathophysiologic basis, extirpation of both the sublingual salivary gland and the ranula by a specialist surgeon is key for a successful outcome.

Citing Articles

Sudden appearance of a plunging ranula in a child: Atypical case report.

Chaabouni M, Kharrat R, Ben Ayed M, Sellami N, Hammami B, Charfeddine I Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025; 128:110928.

PMID: 39908928 PMC: 11847138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.110928.


The Diagnostic Challenge of Sialolithiasis.

Bukhary S J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2025; 12(4):221-224.

PMID: 39811599 PMC: 11729025. DOI: 10.4103/jmau.jmau_92_22.


Bilateral plunging ranula: A case report.

Syawaluddin H, Waseso E, Yudhasoka K, Yantisetiasti A Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 20(1):460-466.

PMID: 39534749 PMC: 11555243. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.10.040.


Sclerotherapy for the intraoral ranula with bleomycin: technical considerations and preliminary experience.

Zhang H, Su L, Sun H, Rui C, Wu Y BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):833.

PMID: 39048989 PMC: 11267835. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04633-8.


An unusual clinical presentation of a plunging ranula-The plunging ranula with extension to the vallecula.

Schmitz L, Buscheck F, Betz C, Bottcher A Clin Case Rep. 2024; 12(6):e8964.

PMID: 38883226 PMC: 11176729. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.8964.


References
1.
Arunachalam P, Priyadharshini N . Recurrent plunging ranula. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2010; 15(1):36-8. PMC: 2998670. DOI: 10.4103/0971-9261.69143. View

2.
Anastassov G, Haiavy J, Solodnik P, Lee H, Lumerman H . Submandibular gland mucocele: diagnosis and management. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000; 89(2):159-63. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2000.102771. View

3.
Engel J, Harn S, Cohen D . Mylohyoid herniation: gross and histologic evaluation with clinical correlation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987; 63(1):55-9. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90340-9. View

4.
Morton R, Ahmad Z, Jain P . Plunging ranula: congenital or acquired?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 142(1):104-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.10.014. View

5.
Charnoff S, Carter B . Plunging ranula: CT diagnosis. Radiology. 1986; 158(2):467-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.3941874. View