» Articles » PMID: 28193599

An Online Intervention Comparing a Very Low-Carbohydrate Ketogenic Diet and Lifestyle Recommendations Versus a Plate Method Diet in Overweight Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2017 Feb 15
PMID 28193599
Citations 86
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes is a prevalent, chronic disease for which diet is an integral aspect of treatment. In our previous trial, we found that recommendations to follow a very low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet and to change lifestyle factors (physical activity, sleep, positive affect, mindfulness) helped overweight people with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes improve glycemic control and lose weight. This was an in-person intervention, which could be a barrier for people without the time, flexibility, transportation, social support, and/or financial resources to attend.

Objective: The aim was to determine whether an online intervention based on our previous recommendations (an ad libitum very low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet with lifestyle factors; "intervention") or an online diet program based on the American Diabetes Associations' "Create Your Plate" diet ("control") would improve glycemic control and other health outcomes among overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: In this pilot feasibility study, we randomized overweight adults (body mass index ≥25) with type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin [HbA] 6.5%-9.0%) to a 32-week online intervention based on our previous recommendations (n=12) or an online diet program based around a plate method diet (n=13) to assess the impact of each intervention on glycemic control and other health outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed by mixed-effects linear regression to compare outcomes by group.

Results: At 32 weeks, participants in the intervention group reduced their HbA levels more (estimated marginal mean [EMM] -0.8%, 95% CI -1.1% to -0.6%) than participants in the control group (EMM -0.3%, 95% CI -0.6% to 0.0%; P=.002). More than half of the participants in the intervention group (6/11, 55%) lowered their HbA to less than 6.5% versus 0% (0/8) in the control group (P=.02). Participants in the intervention group lost more weight (EMM -12.7 kg, 95% CI -16.1 to -9.2 kg) than participants in the control group (EMM -3.0 kg, 95% CI -7.3 to 1.3 kg; P<.001). A greater percentage of participants lost at least 5% of their body weight in the intervention (10/11, 90%) versus the control group (2/8, 29%; P=.01). Participants in the intervention group lowered their triglyceride levels (EMM -60.1 mg/dL, 95% CI -91.3 to -28.9 mg/dL) more than participants in the control group (EMM -6.2 mg/dL, 95% CI -46.0 to 33.6 mg/dL; P=.01). Dropout was 8% (1/12) and 46% (6/13) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (P=.07).

Conclusions: Individuals with type 2 diabetes improved their glycemic control and lost more weight after being randomized to a very low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet and lifestyle online program rather than a conventional, low-fat diabetes diet online program. Thus, the online delivery of these very low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet and lifestyle recommendations may allow them to have a wider reach in the successful self-management of type 2 diabetes.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01967992; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01967992 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6o0fI9Mkq).

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Low-Carbohydrate Diets Versus Low-Fat Diets in Glycemic Control Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

Anyang Kaakyire D, Abdelfattah O, Kumar A, Qadeer S Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77004.

PMID: 39912024 PMC: 11797075. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77004.


The effects of low-carbohydrate diet on glucose and lipid metabolism in overweight or obese patients with T2DM: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Tian W, Cao S, Guan Y, Zhang Z, Liu Q, Ju J Front Nutr. 2025; 11():1516086.

PMID: 39834467 PMC: 11743357. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1516086.


Ketogenic diet in clinical populations-a narrative review.

Zemer A, Samaei S, Yoel U, Biderman A, Pincu Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1432717.

PMID: 39534224 PMC: 11554467. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1432717.


Ketogenic Diet and Its Potential Role in Preventing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications: A Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Alluwyam A, Estrella E Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66419.

PMID: 39246956 PMC: 11380086. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66419.


Alterations in Vagal Tone Are Associated with Changes in the Gut Microbiota of Adults with Anxiety and Depression Symptoms: Analysis of Fecal Metabolite Profiles.

Pasqualette L, Fidalgo T, Freitas-Fernandes L, Souza G, Imbiriba L, Lobo L Metabolites. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39195546 PMC: 11356408. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14080450.


References
1.
Markwald R, Melanson E, Smith M, Higgins J, Perreault L, Eckel R . Impact of insufficient sleep on total daily energy expenditure, food intake, and weight gain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(14):5695-700. PMC: 3619301. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216951110. View

2.
Iqbal N, Vetter M, Moore R, Chittams J, Dalton-Bakes C, Dowd M . Effects of a low-intensity intervention that prescribed a low-carbohydrate vs. a low-fat diet in obese, diabetic participants. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009; 18(9):1733-8. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2009.460. View

3.
Bistrian B, Blackburn G, Flatt J, Sizer J, SCRIMSHAW N, Sherman M . Nitrogen metabolism and insulin requirements in obese diabetic adults on a protein-sparing modified fast. Diabetes. 1976; 25(6):494-504. DOI: 10.2337/diab.25.6.494. View

4.
. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(4):1033-46. PMC: 3609540. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-2625. View

5.
LaBrie J, Quinlan T, Schiffman J, Earleywine M . Performance of alcohol and safer sex change rulers compared with readiness to change questionnaires. Psychol Addict Behav. 2005; 19(1):112-5. DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.1.112. View