» Articles » PMID: 28192145

Population-based Familial Aggregation of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Suggests a Genetic Contribution

Overview
Date 2017 Feb 14
PMID 28192145
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Prior familial clustering studies have observed an increased risk of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) mostly among first-degree relatives, suggesting a genetic contribution to EoE, and twin studies have suggested a powerful contribution from environmental factors.

Objective: This study sought to clarify the contribution of genetic factors to EoE through estimation of familial aggregation and risk of EoE in extended relatives.

Methods: The Utah Population Database, a population-based genealogy resource linked to electronic medical records for health care systems across the state of Utah, was used to identify EoE cases and age, sex, and birthplace-matched controls at a 5:1 ratio. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds of EoE among relatives of EoE probands compared with the odds of EoE among relatives of controls.

Results: There were 4,423 EoE cases and 24,322 controls. The population-attributable risk of EoE was 31% (95% CI, 28% to 34%), suggesting a relatively strong genetic contribution. Risks of EoE were significantly increased among first-degree relatives (odds ratio [OR], 7.19; 95% CI, 5.65-9.14), particularly first-degree relatives of EoE cases diagnosed <18 years of age (OR, 16.3; 95% CI, 9.4-28.3); second-degree relatives (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.49-2.65); and first cousins (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.03-1.77), providing evidence of a genetic contribution. However, spouses of EoE probands were observed to be at increased risk of EoE (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.31-6.25), suggesting either positive assortative mating or a shared environmental contribution to EoE.

Conclusions: This study supports a significant genetic contribution to EoE as evidenced by increased risk of EoE in distant relatives.

Citing Articles

Family History of Eosinophilic Esophagitis or Other Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Is Not Associated With Response to Topical Steroids in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Xue A, LaFata S, Gee T, Thel H, Cameron B, Kiran A Gastro Hep Adv. 2025; 4(3):100585.

PMID: 39926206 PMC: 11802353. DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.11.001.


Common and disparate clinical presentations and mechanisms in different eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.

Shoda T, Taylor R, Sakai N, Rothenberg M J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024; 153(6):1472-1484.

PMID: 38555071 PMC: 11162323. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.03.013.


A Practical Update on Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Votto M, De Filippo M, Caimmi S, Indolfi C, Raffaele A, Tosca M Children (Basel). 2023; 10(10).

PMID: 37892285 PMC: 10605219. DOI: 10.3390/children10101620.


Food allergy: cause or consequence of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis? Potential implications of ultraprocessed foods in prevention and management.

Carucci L, Votto M, Licari A, Marseglia G, Berni Canani R Front Allergy. 2023; 4:1138400.

PMID: 37456790 PMC: 10344695. DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1138400.


Breaking down the complex pathophysiology of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Underwood B, Troutman T, Schwartz J Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022; 130(1):28-39.

PMID: 36351516 PMC: 10165615. DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.10.026.