» Articles » PMID: 28189810

Effect of an Intervention on Observed Sun Protection by Vacationers in a Randomized Controlled Trial at North American Resorts

Overview
Journal Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Feb 13
PMID 28189810
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During vacations, many individuals receive high-risk sun exposure that is associated with skin cancer. Vacationers in outdoor recreation venues (pretest n=4347; posttest n=3986) at warm-weather destination resorts in North America (n=41) were enrolled in a pair-matched, group-randomized pretest-posttest controlled quasi-experimental design in 2012-14. Print, audiovisual, and online messages based on Transportation Theory and Diffusion of Innovation Theory and promoting advanced sun protection (e.g., use of clothing, hats, shade and pre-application/reapplication of sunscreen and reliable cues to high UV) were delivered through resort channels. Vacationers' sun protection practices observed by trained research staff (i.e., body coverage and shade use analyzed individually and in combined scores) did not differ by experimental condition (p>0.05) or intervention implementation (p>0.05). However, recreation venue moderated intervention impact. The intervention improved sun protection at waterside recreation venues (z-score composite: intervention pre=-22.74, post=-15.77; control pre=-27.24, post=-23.24) but not non-waterside venues (z-score composite: intervention pre=20.43, post=20.53; control pre=22.94, post=18.03, p<0.01). An additional analysis showed that resorts with greater program implementation showed more improvements in sun protection by vacationers at waterside (z=score composite: high implementation pre=-25.45, post=-14.05; low implementation pre=-24.70, post=-21.40) compared to non-waterside (z-score composite: high implementation pre=14.51, post=19.98; low implementation pre=24.03, post=18.98, p<0.01) recreation venues. The intervention appeared effective with the vacationers in recreation venues with the highest-risk for sun exposure, waterside venues. However, it was not effective throughout all the resort venues, possibly because of the sun-seeking desires of vacationers, information overload at the resorts, and constraints on clothing styles and sun protection by recreation activity.

Citing Articles

[Digital Applications in the Planning and Implementation of Structural Health Promotion and Prevention Settings: Results of a Scoping Review].

Stark A, Geukes C, Albrecht J, Dockweiler C Gesundheitswesen. 2022; 85(4):380-387.

PMID: 35738302 PMC: 10125336. DOI: 10.1055/a-1757-9264.


Digital Health Promotion and Prevention in Settings: Scoping Review.

Stark A, Geukes C, Dockweiler C J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(1):e21063.

PMID: 35089140 PMC: 8838600. DOI: 10.2196/21063.


Golfers' Interest in Multilevel Sun-Protection Strategies.

Weikert A, Pagoto S, Handley E, Courtney J, Brunke-Reese D, Conroy D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(14).

PMID: 34299704 PMC: 8305060. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147253.


Novel sunprotection interventions to prevent skin cancer: A randomized study targeting Danes going on vacation to destinations with high UV index.

Koster B, Nielsen M, Vester K, Dalum P PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0244597.

PMID: 33382771 PMC: 7774952. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244597.


Solar Ultraviolet Exposure in Individuals Who Perform Outdoor Sport Activities.

Snyder A, Valdebran M, Terrero D, Amber K, Kelly K Sports Med Open. 2020; 6(1):42.

PMID: 32880767 PMC: 7471243. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-020-00272-9.


References
1.
Pukkala E, Karvonen J . Basal cell skin carcinoma and other nonmelanoma skin cancers in Finland from 1956 through 1995. Arch Dermatol. 1999; 135(7):781-6. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.135.7.781. View

2.
Green M, Brock T . The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000; 79(5):701-21. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.701. View

3.
Geller A, Glanz K, Shigaki D, Isnec M, Sun T, Maddock J . Impact of skin cancer prevention on outdoor aquatics staff: the Pool Cool program in Hawaii and Massachusetts. Prev Med. 2001; 33(3):155-61. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0870. View

4.
Weinstock M, Rossi J, Redding C, Maddock J . Randomized controlled community trial of the efficacy of a multicomponent stage-matched intervention to increase sun protection among beachgoers. Prev Med. 2002; 35(6):584-92. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1114. View

5.
Pagoto S, McChargue D, Fuqua R . Effects of a multicomponent intervention on motivation and sun protection behaviors among midwestern beachgoers. Health Psychol. 2003; 22(4):429-33. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.429. View