» Articles » PMID: 28189769

Decision Making Regarding the Place of End-of-Life Cancer Care: The Burden on Bereaved Families and Related Factors

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Feb 13
PMID 28189769
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Decision making regarding the place of end-of-life (EOL) care is an important issue for patients with terminal cancer and their families. It often requires surrogate decision making, which can be a burden on families.

Objectives: To explore the burden on the family of patients dying from cancer related to the decisions they made about the place of EOL care and investigate the factors affecting this burden.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional mail survey using a self-administered questionnaire. Participants were 700 bereaved family members of patients with cancer from 133 palliative care units in Japan. The questionnaire covered decisional burdens, depression, grief, and the decision-making process.

Results: Participants experienced emotional pressure as the highest burden. Participants with a high decisional burden reported significantly higher scores for depression and grief (both P < 0.001). Multiple regression analyses revealed that higher burden was associated with selecting a place of EOL care that differed from that desired by participants (P < 0.001) and patients (P = 0.034), decision making without knowing the patient's wishes and values (P < 0.001) and without participants sharing their wishes and values with the patient's doctors and/or nurses (P = 0.022), and making the decision because of a due date for discharge from a former facility or hospital (P = 0.005).

Conclusion: Decision making regarding the place of EOL care was recalled as burdensome for family decision makers. An early decision-making process that incorporates sharing patients' and family members' values that are relevant to the desired place of EOL care is important.

Citing Articles

Experiences of End-of-Life Decision-Making in Equine Veterinary and Charity Teams.

Cameron A, Geldard M, Mair T, England G, Burford J, Freeman S Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075960 PMC: 11898496. DOI: 10.3390/ani15050678.


Experiences and barriers in downward referral decision-making for palliative care patient caregivers under China's three-tiered linkage model: A qualitative study.

Liu Y, Xu Y, Kang Y, Wu L, Zhou Y, Yuan L Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024; 12:100578.

PMID: 39717625 PMC: 11665697. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100578.


Providers' Competencies and Management Practices for Traditional Palliative Cancer Care Service Delivery in Kenya.

Cheboi S, Nganga W, Nyamanga P, Kibet S Health Serv Insights. 2023; 16:11786329231211780.

PMID: 38028116 PMC: 10658765. DOI: 10.1177/11786329231211780.


Breaking bad news in the era of artificial intelligence and algorithmic medicine: an exploration of disclosure and its ethical justification using the hedonic calculus.

Post B, Badea C, Faisal A, Brett S AI Ethics. 2022; :1-14.

PMID: 36338525 PMC: 9628590. DOI: 10.1007/s43681-022-00230-z.


What does it mean to be the main caregiver to a terminally ill family member in Lithuania?: A qualitative study.

Kuznecoviene J, Butkeviciene R, Harrison W, Peicius E, Urbonas G, Astromske K PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0265165.

PMID: 35551302 PMC: 9098011. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265165.