» Articles » PMID: 28182142

Elemental Calcium Intake Associated with Calcium Acetate/calcium Carbonate in the Treatment of Hyperphosphatemia

Overview
Journal Drugs Context
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2017 Feb 10
PMID 28182142
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Calcium-based and non-calcium-based phosphate binders have similar efficacy in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia; however, calcium-based binders may be associated with hypercalcemia, vascular calcification, and adynamic bone disease.

Scope: A analysis was carried out of data from a 16-week, Phase IV study of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who switched to lanthanum carbonate monotherapy from baseline calcium acetate/calcium carbonate monotherapy. Of the intent-to-treat population (N=2520), 752 patients with recorded dose data for calcium acetate (n=551)/calcium carbonate (n=201) at baseline and lanthanum carbonate at week 16 were studied. Elemental calcium intake, serum phosphate, corrected serum calcium, and serum intact parathyroid hormone levels were analyzed.

Findings: Of the 551 patients with calcium acetate dose data, 271 (49.2%) had an elemental calcium intake of at least 1.5 g/day at baseline, and 142 (25.8%) had an intake of at least 2.0 g/day. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) serum phosphate levels were 6.1 (5.89, 6.21) mg/dL at baseline and 6.2 (6.04, 6.38) mg/dL at 16 weeks; mean (95% CI) corrected serum calcium levels were 9.3 (9.16, 9.44) mg/dL and 9.2 (9.06, 9.34) mg/dL, respectively. Of the 201 patients with calcium carbonate dose data, 117 (58.2%) had an elemental calcium intake of at least 1.5 g/day, and 76 (37.8%) had an intake of at least 2.0 g/day. Mean (95% CI) serum phosphate levels were 5.8 (5.52, 6.06) mg/dL at baseline and 5.8 (5.53, 6.05) mg/dL at week 16; mean (95% CI) corrected serum calcium levels were 9.7 (9.15, 10.25) mg/dL and 9.2 (9.06, 9.34) mg/dL, respectively.

Conclusion: Calcium acetate/calcium carbonate phosphate binders, taken to control serum phosphate levels, may result in high levels of elemental calcium intake. This may lead to complications related to calcium balance.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and risk factors for hypercalcemia among non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder.

Seng J, Tan Y, Lim R, Ng H, Lee P, Wong J Int Urol Nephrol. 2018; 50(10):1871-1877.

PMID: 29882003 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1906-x.

References
1.
Moe S, Chertow G . The case against calcium-based phosphate binders. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007; 1(4):697-703. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00560206. View

2.
Fernandez-Martin J, Carrero J, Benedik M, Bos W, Covic A, Ferreira A . COSMOS: the dialysis scenario of CKD-MBD in Europe. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012; 28(7):1922-35. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs418. View

3.
Budoff M, Rader D, Reilly M, Mohler 3rd E, Lash J, Yang W . Relationship of estimated GFR and coronary artery calcification in the CRIC (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011; 58(4):519-26. PMC: 3183168. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.04.024. View

4.
Block G, Spiegel D, Ehrlich J, Mehta R, Lindbergh J, Dreisbach A . Effects of sevelamer and calcium on coronary artery calcification in patients new to hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2005; 68(4):1815-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00600.x. View

5.
Hruska K, Mathew S, Lund R, Qiu P, Pratt R . Hyperphosphatemia of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2008; 74(2):148-57. PMC: 2735026. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.130. View