Comparison of the Working Memory Load in -Back and Working Memory Span Tasks by Means of EEG Frequency Band Power and P300 Amplitude

Overview

Journal Front Hum Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2017 Feb 10

PMID 28179880

Citations 50

Authors

Christian Scharinger

Alexander Soutschek

Torsten Schubert

Peter Gerjets

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

According to theoretical accounts, both, -back and complex span tasks mainly require working memory (WM) processing. In contrast, simple span tasks conceptually mainly require WM storage. Thus, conceptually, an -back task and a complex span task share more commonalities as compared to a simple span task. In the current study, we compared an -back task, a complex operation span task (Ospan), and a simple digit span task (Dspan) by means of typical WM load-related measures of the Electroencephalogram (EEG) like the parietal alpha and beta frequency band power, the frontal theta frequency band power, and the P300 amplitude, to examine whether these tasks would show commonalities or differences in WM processing-load. We expected that increasing WM-load would generally lead to a decreased alpha and beta frequency band power, an increased theta frequency band power, and a decreased P300 amplitude. Yet, based on the conceptual considerations, we hypothesized that the outcomes of these measures would be more comparable between the -back and the Ospan as compared to the Dspan. Our hypotheses were partly confirmed. The -back and the Ospan showed timely more prolonged alpha frequency band power effects as compared to the Dspan. This might indicate higher demands on WM processing in the former two tasks. The theta frequency band power and the P300 amplitude were most pronounced in the -back task as compared to both span tasks. This might indicate specific demands on cognitive control in the -back task. Additionally, we observed that behavioral performance measures correlated with changes in EEG alpha power of the -back and the Ospan, yet not of the Dspan. Taken together, the hypothesized conceptual commonalities between the -back task and the Ospan (and, for the Dspan, differences) were only partly confirmed by the electrophysiological WM load-related measures, indicating a potential need for reconsidering the theoretical accounts on WM tasks and the value of a closer link to electrophysiological research herein.

Citing Articles

Elusive Gains of Cognitive Training: Limited Effects on Neural Activity Across Sessions.

Juras L, Vranic A, Hromatko I Brain Sci. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851390 PMC: 11764387. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15010022.

The effect of workload on mind-wandering of drilling operators measured by electroencephalography (EEG).

Hao S, Ruiying X, Lifei X, Jian W, Jiaxin J, Siping F Exp Brain Res. 2024; 243(1):29.

PMID: 39704838 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06974-w.

How is social dominance related to our short-term memory? An EEG/ERP investigation of encoding and retrieval during a working memory task.

Mohamadpour H, Farkhondeh Tale Navi F, Heysieattalab S, Irak M, Vahabie A, Nikzad B Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e37389.

PMID: 39296172 PMC: 11408820. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37389.

The cognitive triad network - oscillation - behaviour links individual differences in EEG theta frequency with task performance and effective connectivity.

Gomez-Lombardi A, Costa B, Gutierrez P, Carvajal P, Rivera L, El-Deredy W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21482.

PMID: 39277643 PMC: 11401920. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72229-x.

The mutual influences between working memory and empathy for pain: the role of social distance.

Yang Y, Zhao J, Zhang H, Bi T, Tian J, Li Q Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 39238223 PMC: 11451274. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae061.

References

Klimesch W . EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999; 29(2-3):169-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3. View

Krause C, Sillanmaki L, Koivisto M, Saarela C, Haggqvist A, Laine M . The effects of memory load on event-related EEG desynchronization and synchronization. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 111(11):2071-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00429-6. View

Baddeley A . Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003; 4(10):829-39. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1201. View

Krause C, Pesonen M, Hamalainen H . Brain oscillatory 4-30 Hz electroencephalogram responses in adolescents during a visual memory task. Neuroreport. 2010; 21(11):767-71. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833bfcbb. View

Duncan C, Barry R, Connolly J, Fischer C, Michie P, Naatanen R . Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120(11):1883-1908. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045. View

Schalk G, McFarland D, Hinterberger T, Birbaumer N, Wolpaw J . BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004; 51(6):1034-43. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2004.827072. View

Hester R, Kinsella G, Ong B . Effect of age on forward and backward span tasks. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004; 10(4):475-81. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617704104037. View

Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva F . Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 110(11):1842-57. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00141-8. View

Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John E . Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science. 1965; 150(3700):1187-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.150.3700.1187. View

10.

Stipacek A, Grabner R, Neuper C, Fink A, Neubauer A . Sensitivity of human EEG alpha band desynchronization to different working memory components and increasing levels of memory load. Neurosci Lett. 2003; 353(3):193-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.09.044. View

11.

Palva S, Palva J . New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. Trends Neurosci. 2007; 30(4):150-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.02.001. View

12.

Owen A, McMillan K, Laird A, Bullmore E . N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005; 25(1):46-59. PMC: 6871745. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20131. View

13.

Engel A, Fries P . Beta-band oscillations--signalling the status quo?. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010; 20(2):156-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015. View

14.

Miller K, Price C, Okun M, Montijo H, Bowers D . Is the n-back task a valid neuropsychological measure for assessing working memory?. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 24(7):711-7. PMC: 2770861. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acp063. View

15.

Picton T . The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 9(4):456-79. DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199210000-00002. View

16.

Jensen O, Gelfand J, Kounios J, Lisman J . Oscillations in the alpha band (9-12 Hz) increase with memory load during retention in a short-term memory task. Cereb Cortex. 2002; 12(8):877-82. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/12.8.877. View

17.

Pesonen M, Hamalainen H, Krause C . Brain oscillatory 4-30 Hz responses during a visual n-back memory task with varying memory load. Brain Res. 2007; 1138:171-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.076. View

18.

Unsworth N, Engle R . On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychol Bull. 2007; 133(6):1038-66. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.1038. View

19.

Chen Y, Mitra S, Schlaghecken F . Sub-processes of working memory in the N-back task: an investigation using ERPs. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008; 119(7):1546-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.003. View

20.

Kane M, Conway A, Miura T, Colflesh G . Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(3):615-622. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.615. View