» Articles » PMID: 28178376

Treatment Trends for Patients with Brain Metastases: Does Practice Reflect the Data?

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Feb 9
PMID 28178376
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Published guidelines regarding the optimal treatment strategies for brain metastases focus on patients with ≤3 lesions. As delivery techniques for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) improve, radiation oncologists are increasingly using it for patients with >3 metastases. In the current study, the authors sought to characterize practice patterns among practitioners to identify areas of controversy.

Methods: A survey of practicing radiation oncologists was distributed via e-mail. Responses were collected from April 1 to May 5, 2016. Survey data were analyzed.

Results: A total of 711 currently practicing radiation oncologists responded, for a response rate of 12.5%. Specialists in central nervous system tumors (CNS specialists) were more likely to treat higher numbers of patients with brain metastases with SRS. There was a significant difference in the optimal "cutoff number" used when deciding how many lesions to treat with SRS versus whole-brain radiotherapy. Cutoff numbers were significantly higher for high-volume CNS specialists (≥10 patients/month) than for either low-volume CNS specialists (5-9 patients/month) or high-volume, non-CNS specialists (8.1 vs 5.6 and 5.1, respectively; P<.001). A majority of respondents (56%) identified patients with 4 to 6 brain metastases as being the most challenging patients to treat.

Conclusions: To the authors' knowledge, there appears to be no consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy among patients with >3 brain metastases, and practice patterns are heterogeneous. Radiation oncologists, especially high-volume CNS specialists, are treating significantly more brain metastases with SRS than what currently is recommended by published consensus guidelines. Providers struggle with patients with a moderate intracranial disease burden. Further prospective studies are needed to support these practice patterns and guide decision making. Cancer 2017;123:2274-2282. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Citing Articles

Patient and physician attitudes towards salvage stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy for brain metastases.

Rich B, Almeida T, Maas J, Mehta S, Singh R, Perlow H J Radiosurg SBRT. 2024; 9(2):101-111.

PMID: 39087061 PMC: 11288657.


Stereotactic radiosurgery and multidisciplinary care in neuro-oncology.

Sheehan J, Trifiletti D, Cifarelli C J Neurooncol. 2023; 161(3):655-656.

PMID: 36695973 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04245-2.


How many brain metastases can be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery before the radiation dose delivered to normal brain tissue rivals that associated with standard whole brain radiotherapy?.

Becker S, Lipson E, Jozsef G, Molitoris J, Silverman J, Presser J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(3):e13856.

PMID: 36628586 PMC: 10018670. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13856.


Time taken for a primary tumor to metastasize to the brain and the overall survival of patients with brain metastasis: An analysis of outcomes and factors affecting survival.

Hao P, Chen L, Ge Y, You Y, Yan G, Jin Z Technol Health Care. 2022; 30(S1):259-270.

PMID: 35124603 PMC: 9028614. DOI: 10.3233/THC-228025.


NTCP modeling and dose-volume correlations for acute xerostomia and dry eye after whole brain radiation.

Mavroidis P, Pearlstein K, Moon D, Xu V, Royce T, Weiner A Radiat Oncol. 2021; 16(1):56.

PMID: 33743773 PMC: 7981795. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01786-6.