» Articles » PMID: 28173839

Characterisation of Larval Habitats, Species Composition and Factors Associated with the Seasonal Abundance of Mosquito Fauna in Gezira, Sudan

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Feb 9
PMID 28173839
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Larval source management (LSM), which requires an understanding of the ecology and composition of the local mosquito fauna, is an important parameter in successful vector control programmes. The present study was conducted to understand the distribution of larval habitats, species composition and factors associated with the seasonal abundance of mosquito larvae in Gezira irrigation Scheme in Gezira state, central Sudan.

Methods: Cross-sectional larval surveys were carried out in the communities of Barakat (urban) and El-Kareiba (semi-urban), in Wad Madani, Gezira. A standard dipper was used for sampling larvae in all possible breeding sites and enamel bowls were employed for larvae sorting. Habitats were characterised using physical features and all larvae specimens were identified morphologically.

Results: A total of 331 larval habitats were surveyed, out of which 166 were found to be positive breeding sites for Anopheles (56.78%), Culicinae (29.67%) and Aedes (13.55%) species. A total of 5 525 larvae collected were categorised as Culex (2 617, 47.37%), Anopheles (2 600, 47.06%) and Aedes (308, 5.57%). There was a high number of positive habitats during the rainy season, while the lowest proportion was reported during the hot dry season, in both study sites (Barakat [χ  = 10.641, P = 0.0090], El-Kareiba [χ  = 23.765, P = 0.0001]). The main breeding site for Anopheles larvae was leaking water pipes (51.5%), followed by irrigation channels (34.2%), hoof prints (6.4%), tyre tracks (5.5%) and water tanks (2.4%). A logistic regression analysis showed that the abundance of Anopheles larvae was reduced by the presence of predators (backswimmers, tadpoles) and grass cover. Adult productivity (number of adult females emerged/m) was not homogeneousfor all habitats; the highest productivity was found in irrigation channels (0.78 females/m) for Anopheles, and in septic tanks (2.86 females/m) for Culicinae and (0.86 females/m) for Aedes. Anopheles arabiensis was found to be the dominant Anopheles species. This study documented the presence of An. funestus in central Sudan for the first time.

Conclusions: Maintaining leaking water pipes and adopting intermittent irrigation are recommended for LSM, as these surveyed habitats represent the main source of maintaining the local mosquito population during the hot dry season.

Citing Articles

The Interspecific Competition Between Larvae of and Major African Malaria Vectors in a Semi-Field System in Tanzania.

Lushasi S, Mwalugelo Y, Swai J, Mmbando A, Muyaga L, Nyolobi N Insects. 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39859615 PMC: 11765750. DOI: 10.3390/insects16010034.


Mitigating the Public Health Issues Caused by the Filarial Vector, Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) Through Phytocontrol and Larval Source Marker Management.

Chatterjee S, Sarkar B, Bag S, Biswal D, Mandal A, Bandyopadhyay R Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2023; 196(8):5013-5044.

PMID: 37999898 DOI: 10.1007/s12010-023-04747-9.


Using ecological observations to improve malaria control in areas where Anopheles funestus is the dominant vector.

Kahamba N, Finda M, Ngowo H, Msugupakulya B, Baldini F, Koekemoer L Malar J. 2022; 21(1):158.

PMID: 35655190 PMC: 9161514. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04198-3.


Larval ecology and bionomics of Anopheles funestus in highland and lowland sites in western Kenya.

Debrah I, Afrane Y, Amoah L, Ochwedo K, Mukabana W, Zhong D PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0255321.

PMID: 34634069 PMC: 8504749. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255321.


Long-lasting microbial larvicides for controlling insecticide resistant and outdoor transmitting vectors: a cost-effective supplement for malaria interventions.

Zhou G, Lo E, Githeko A, Afrane Y, Yan G Infect Dis Poverty. 2020; 9(1):162.

PMID: 33243294 PMC: 7691065. DOI: 10.1186/s40249-020-00767-3.

References
1.
Dhimal M, Ahrens B, Kuch U . Species composition, seasonal occurrence, habitat preference and altitudinal distribution of malaria and other disease vectors in eastern Nepal. Parasit Vectors. 2014; 7:540. PMC: 4252987. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-014-0540-4. View

2.
Himeidan Y, El Rayah A, Rayah E . Role of some environmental factors on the breeding activity of Anopheles arabiensis in New Halfa town, eastern Sudan. East Mediterr Health J. 2008; 14(2):252-9. View

3.
El Gaddal A, Haridi A, Hassan F, Hussein H . Malaria control in the Gezira-Managil Irrigated Scheme of the Sudan. J Trop Med Hyg. 1985; 88(2):153-9. View

4.
Chaki P, Govella N, Shoo B, Hemed A, Tanner M, Fillinger U . Achieving high coverage of larval-stage mosquito surveillance: challenges for a community-based mosquito control programme in urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Malar J. 2010; 8:311. PMC: 2806382. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-311. View

5.
Seufi A, Galal F . Role of Culex and Anopheles mosquito species as potential vectors of rift valley fever virus in Sudan outbreak, 2007. BMC Infect Dis. 2010; 10:65. PMC: 2841661. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-65. View