» Articles » PMID: 28164243

Causes and Consequences of Rapidly Evolving MtDNA in a Plant Lineage

Overview
Date 2017 Feb 7
PMID 28164243
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding mechanisms of coevolution between nuclear and mitochondrial (mt) genomes is a defining challenge in eukaryotic genetics. The angiosperm genus Silene is a natural system to investigate the causes and consequences of mt mutation rate variation because closely related species have highly divergent rates. In Silene species with fast-evolving mtDNA, nuclear genes that encode mitochondrially targeted proteins (N-mt genes) are also fast-evolving. This correlation could indicate positive selection to compensate for mt mutations, but might also result from a recent relaxation of selection. To differentiate between these interpretations, we used phylogenetic and population-genetic methods to test for positive and relaxed selection in three classes of N-mt genes (oxidative phosphorylation genes, ribosomal genes, and "RRR" genes involved in mtDNA recombination, replication, and repair). In all three classes, we found that species with fast-evolving mtDNA had: 1) elevated dN/dS, 2) an excess of nonsynonymous divergence relative to levels of intraspecific polymorphism, which is a signature of positive selection, and 3) no clear signals of relaxed selection. "Control" genes exhibited comparatively few signs of positive selection. These results suggest that high mt mutation rates can create selection on N-mt genes and that relaxed selection is an unlikely cause of recent accelerations in the evolution of N-mt genes. Because mt-RRR genes were found to be under positive selection, it is unlikely that elevated mt mutation rates in Silene were caused by inactivation of these mt-RRR genes. Therefore, the causes of extreme increases in angiosperm mt mutation rates remain uncertain.

Citing Articles

Recombination and retroprocessing in broomrapes reveal a universal roadmap for mitochondrial evolution in heterotrophic plants.

Cai L, Havird J, Jansen R bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990427 PMC: 11844532. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.14.637881.


Cytonuclear evolution in fully heterotrophic plants: lifestyles and gene function determine scenarios.

Guo X, Wang H, Lin D, Wang Y, Jin X BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):989.

PMID: 39428472 PMC: 11492565. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05702-4.


Nuclear compensatory evolution driven by mito-nuclear incompatibilities.

Princepe D, de Aguiar M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(42):e2411672121.

PMID: 39392668 PMC: 11494290. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2411672121.


Rapid evolution of mitochondrion-related genes in haplodiploid arthropods.

Li Y, Thomas G, Richards S, Waterhouse R, Zhou X, Pfrender M BMC Biol. 2024; 22(1):229.

PMID: 39390511 PMC: 11465517. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-024-02027-4.


Mitonuclear compatibility is maintained despite relaxed selection on male mitochondrial DNA in bivalves with doubly uniparental inheritance.

Smith C, Mejia-Trujillo R, Havird J Evolution. 2024; 78(11):1790-1803.

PMID: 38995057 PMC: 11519007. DOI: 10.1093/evolut/qpae108.


References
1.
Denver D, Morris K, Lynch M, Vassilieva L, Thomas W . High direct estimate of the mutation rate in the mitochondrial genome of Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2000; 289(5488):2342-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5488.2342. View

2.
Tajima F . Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989; 123(3):585-95. PMC: 1203831. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. View

3.
Pett W, Lavrov D . Cytonuclear Interactions in the Evolution of Animal Mitochondrial tRNA Metabolism. Genome Biol Evol. 2015; 7(8):2089-101. PMC: 4558845. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evv124. View

4.
Wu Z, Cuthbert J, Taylor D, Sloan D . The massive mitochondrial genome of the angiosperm Silene noctiflora is evolving by gain or loss of entire chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(33):10185-91. PMC: 4547255. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421397112. View

5.
Fu Y, Li W . Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 1993; 133(3):693-709. PMC: 1205353. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.693. View