» Articles » PMID: 28159916

Impact of Deploying Multiple Point-of-care Tests with a 'sample First' Approach on a Sexual Health Clinical Care Pathway. A Service Evaluation

Overview
Date 2017 Feb 5
PMID 28159916
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess clinical service value of STI point-of-care test (POCT) use in a 'sample first' clinical pathway (patients providing samples on arrival at clinic, before clinician consultation). Specific outcomes were: patient acceptability; whether a rapid nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for (CT/NG) could be used as a POCT in practice; feasibility of non-NAAT POCT implementation for (TV) and bacterial vaginosis (BV); impact on patient diagnosis and treatment.

Methods: Service evaluation in a south London sexual health clinic. Symptomatic female and male patients and sexual contacts of CT/NG-positive individuals provided samples for diagnostic testing on clinic arrival, prior to clinical consultation. Tests included routine culture and microscopy; CT/NG (GeneXpert) NAAT; non-NAAT POCTs for TV and BV.

Results: All 70 (35 males, 35 females) patients approached participated. The 'sample first' pathway was acceptable, with >90% reporting they were happy to give samples on arrival and receive results in the same visit. Non-NAAT POCT results were available for all patients prior to leaving clinic; rapid CT/NG results were available for only 21.4% (15/70; 5 males, 10 females) of patients prior to leaving clinic. Known negative CT/NG results led to two females avoiding presumptive treatment, and one male receiving treatment directed at possible infection causing non-gonococcal urethritis. Non-NAAT POCTs detected more positives than routine microscopy (TV 3 vs 2; BV 24 vs 7), resulting in more patients receiving treatment.

Conclusions: A 'sample first' clinical pathway to enable multiple POCT use was acceptable to patients and feasible in a busy sexual health clinic, but rapid CT/NG processing time was too long to enable POCT use. There is need for further development to improve test processing times to enable POC use of rapid NAATs.

Citing Articles

German evidence- and consensus-based guideline on the management of penile urethritis.

Werner R, Vader I, Abunijela S, Bickel M, Biel A, Boesecke C J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2025; 23(2):254-275.

PMID: 39822084 PMC: 11803366. DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15617.


Comprehensive assessment of vaginal infections using a single swab.

Van Der Pol B, Aycock C, Dixon P, Kodsi S, Paradis S, Torres-Chavolla E Sex Transm Infect. 2024; 101(1):17-20.

PMID: 39214691 PMC: 11877100. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2024-056263.


Vaginal Swab vs Urine for Detection of , and A Meta-Analysis.

Aaron K, Griner S, Footman A, Boutwell A, Van Der Pol B Ann Fam Med. 2023; 21(2):172-179.

PMID: 36973065 PMC: 10042575. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2942.


Assessing the clinical impact and resource use of a 30-minute chlamydia and gonorrhoea point-of-care test at three sexual health services.

Huntington S, Weston G, Adams E Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2021; 8:20499361211061645.

PMID: 34881023 PMC: 8647227. DOI: 10.1177/20499361211061645.


Molecular chlamydia and gonorrhoea point of care tests implemented into routine practice: Systematic review and value proposition development.

Fuller S, Clarke E, Harding-Esch E PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0259593.

PMID: 34748579 PMC: 8575247. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259593.


References
1.
Wingrove I, McOwan A, Nwokolo N, Whitlock G . Diagnostics within the clinic to test for gonorrhoea and chlamydia reduces the time to treatment: a service evaluation. Sex Transm Infect. 2014; 90(6):474. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051580. View

2.
Chen C, Cromwell E, King J, Mosher A, Harding-Esch E, Ngondi J . Incremental cost of conducting population-based prevalence surveys for a neglected tropical disease: the example of trachoma in 8 national programs. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011; 5(3):e979. PMC: 3050919. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000979. View

3.
de Cortina S, Bristow C, Davey D, Klausner J . A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 2016:4386127. PMC: 4899593. DOI: 10.1155/2016/4386127. View

4.
Gaydos C, Van Der Pol B, Jett-Goheen M, Barnes M, Quinn N, Clark C . Performance of the Cepheid CT/NG Xpert Rapid PCR Test for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 2013; 51(6):1666-72. PMC: 3716060. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03461-12. View

5.
Nathan B, Appiah J, Saunders P, Heron D, Nichols T, Brum R . Microscopy outperformed in a comparison of five methods for detecting Trichomonas vaginalis in symptomatic women. Int J STD AIDS. 2014; 26(4):251-6. DOI: 10.1177/0956462414534833. View