Impact of Deploying Multiple Point-of-care Tests with a 'sample First' Approach on a Sexual Health Clinical Care Pathway. A Service Evaluation
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: To assess clinical service value of STI point-of-care test (POCT) use in a 'sample first' clinical pathway (patients providing samples on arrival at clinic, before clinician consultation). Specific outcomes were: patient acceptability; whether a rapid nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for (CT/NG) could be used as a POCT in practice; feasibility of non-NAAT POCT implementation for (TV) and bacterial vaginosis (BV); impact on patient diagnosis and treatment.
Methods: Service evaluation in a south London sexual health clinic. Symptomatic female and male patients and sexual contacts of CT/NG-positive individuals provided samples for diagnostic testing on clinic arrival, prior to clinical consultation. Tests included routine culture and microscopy; CT/NG (GeneXpert) NAAT; non-NAAT POCTs for TV and BV.
Results: All 70 (35 males, 35 females) patients approached participated. The 'sample first' pathway was acceptable, with >90% reporting they were happy to give samples on arrival and receive results in the same visit. Non-NAAT POCT results were available for all patients prior to leaving clinic; rapid CT/NG results were available for only 21.4% (15/70; 5 males, 10 females) of patients prior to leaving clinic. Known negative CT/NG results led to two females avoiding presumptive treatment, and one male receiving treatment directed at possible infection causing non-gonococcal urethritis. Non-NAAT POCTs detected more positives than routine microscopy (TV 3 vs 2; BV 24 vs 7), resulting in more patients receiving treatment.
Conclusions: A 'sample first' clinical pathway to enable multiple POCT use was acceptable to patients and feasible in a busy sexual health clinic, but rapid CT/NG processing time was too long to enable POCT use. There is need for further development to improve test processing times to enable POC use of rapid NAATs.
German evidence- and consensus-based guideline on the management of penile urethritis.
Werner R, Vader I, Abunijela S, Bickel M, Biel A, Boesecke C J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2025; 23(2):254-275.
PMID: 39822084 PMC: 11803366. DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15617.
Comprehensive assessment of vaginal infections using a single swab.
Van Der Pol B, Aycock C, Dixon P, Kodsi S, Paradis S, Torres-Chavolla E Sex Transm Infect. 2024; 101(1):17-20.
PMID: 39214691 PMC: 11877100. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2024-056263.
Vaginal Swab vs Urine for Detection of , and A Meta-Analysis.
Aaron K, Griner S, Footman A, Boutwell A, Van Der Pol B Ann Fam Med. 2023; 21(2):172-179.
PMID: 36973065 PMC: 10042575. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2942.
Huntington S, Weston G, Adams E Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2021; 8:20499361211061645.
PMID: 34881023 PMC: 8647227. DOI: 10.1177/20499361211061645.
Fuller S, Clarke E, Harding-Esch E PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0259593.
PMID: 34748579 PMC: 8575247. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259593.