» Articles » PMID: 28159854

Can Patient Involvement Improve Patient Safety? A Cluster Randomised Control Trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) Intervention

Overview
Journal BMJ Qual Saf
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Feb 5
PMID 28159854
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment intervention.

Design: A multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Clusters were 33 hospital wards within five hospitals in the UK.

Participants: All patients able to give informed consent were eligible to take part. Wards were allocated to the intervention or control condition.

Intervention: The ward-level intervention comprised two tools: (1) a questionnaire that asked patients about factors contributing to safety (patient measure of safety (PMOS)) and (2) a proforma for patients to report both safety concerns and positive experiences (patient incident reporting tool). Feedback was considered in multidisciplinary action planning meetings.

Measurements: Primary outcomes were routinely collected ward-level harm-free care (HFC) scores and patient-level feedback on safety (PMOS).

Results: Intervention uptake and retention of wards was 100% and patient participation was high (86%). We found no significant effect of the intervention on any outcomes at 6 or 12 months. However, for new harms (ie, those for which the wards were directly accountable) intervention wards did show greater, though non-significant, improvement compared with control wards. Analyses also indicated that improvements were largest for wards that showed the greatest compliance with the intervention.

Limitations: Adherence to the intervention, particularly the implementation of action plans, was poor. Patient safety outcomes may represent too blunt a measure.

Conclusions: Patients are willing to provide feedback about the safety of their care. However, we were unable to demonstrate any overall effect of this intervention on either measure of patient safety and therefore cannot recommend this intervention for wider uptake. Findings indicate promise for increasing HFC where wards implement ≥75% of the intervention components.

Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN07689702; pre-results.

Citing Articles

Transforming healthcare: Saudi Arabia's vision 2030 healthcare model.

Suleiman A, Ming L J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025; 18(1):2449051.

PMID: 39845746 PMC: 11753010. DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2449051.


Barriers to integration of health and equity into urban design policies in Regina, Saskatchewan.

Mahani A, Lyeo J, Fung A, Husack K, Muhajarine N, Diener T Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(6).

PMID: 39657149 PMC: 11630771. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae184.


A qualitative study of patient competence for patient engagement in their safety--from the perspective of nurses and patients.

Lu Y, Zhang J, Liu X, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Yan Q BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):780.

PMID: 39448995 PMC: 11515638. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02440-8.


Motivation for patient engagement in patient safety: a multi-perspective, explorative survey.

Raab C, Gambashidze N, Brust L, Weigl M, Koch A BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1052.

PMID: 39261814 PMC: 11391733. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11495-x.


Patient and family engagement in patient safety in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a scoping review.

Abdi Z, Ravaghi H, Sarkhosh S, Nafar H, Khani S, Letaief M BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):765.

PMID: 38918854 PMC: 11202252. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11198-3.


References
1.
Haines T, Hill A, Hill K, McPhail S, Oliver D, Brauer S . Patient education to prevent falls among older hospital inpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 171(6):516-24. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.444. View

2.
Lawton R, McEachan R, Giles S, Sirriyeh R, Watt I, Wright J . Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21(5):369-80. PMC: 3332004. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000443. View

3.
Schwappach D . Review: engaging patients as vigilant partners in safety: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev. 2009; 67(2):119-48. DOI: 10.1177/1077558709342254. View

4.
Waterman A, Gallagher T, Garbutt J, Waterman B, Fraser V, Burroughs T . Brief report: Hospitalized patients' attitudes about and participation in error prevention. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21(4):367-70. PMC: 1484719. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00385.x. View

5.
Shekelle P, Pronovost P, Wachter R, McDonald K, Schoelles K, Dy S . The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158(5 Pt 2):365-8. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00001. View