» Articles » PMID: 28158993

Comparative Differential Proteomic Analysis of Minimal Change Disease and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Overview
Journal BMC Nephrol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2017 Feb 5
PMID 28158993
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Minimal change disease (MCD) and primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are glomerular diseases characterized by nephrotic syndrome. Their diagnosis requires a renal biopsy, but it is an invasive procedure with potential complications. In a small biopsy sample, where only normal glomeruli are observed, FSGS cannot be differentiated from MCD. The correct diagnosis is crucial to an effective treatment, as MCD is normally responsive to steroid therapy, whereas FSGS is usually resistant. The purpose of our study was to discover and validate novel early urinary biomarkers capable to differentiate between MCD and FSGS.

Methods: Forty-nine patients biopsy-diagnosed of MCD and primary FSGS were randomly subdivided into a training set (10 MCD, 11 FSGS) and a validation set (14 MCD, 14 FSGS). The urinary proteome of the training set was analyzed by two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry. The proteins identified were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in urine samples from the validation set.

Results: Urinary concentration of alpha-1 antitrypsin, transferrin, histatin-3 and 39S ribosomal protein L17 was decreased and calretinin was increased in FSGS compared to MCD. These proteins were used to build a decision tree capable to predict patient's pathology.

Conclusions: This preliminary study suggests a group of urinary proteins as possible non-invasive biomarkers with potential value in the differential diagnosis of MCD and FSGS. These biomarkers would reduce the number of misdiagnoses, avoiding unnecessary or inadequate treatments.

Citing Articles

Proteomic profiling of kidney biopsies in nephrotic syndrome.

Williams E, Fresquet M, Li A, Lawless C, Knight D, Colby E Wellcome Open Res. 2025; 9:731.

PMID: 39991116 PMC: 11845903. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22633.1.


Minimal Change Disease: Pathogenetic Insights from Glomerular Proteomics.

Barar A, Pralea I, Maslyennikov Y, Munteanu R, Berindan-Neagoe I, Pirlog R Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(11).

PMID: 38891801 PMC: 11171934. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115613.


Recent Advances in Urinary Peptide and Proteomic Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.

Catanese L, Siwy J, Mischak H, Wendt R, Beige J, Rupprecht H Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(11).

PMID: 37298105 PMC: 10252389. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119156.


Targeted MRM Quantification of Urinary Proteins in Chronic Kidney Disease Caused by Glomerulopathies.

Kononikhin A, Brzhozovskiy A, Bugrova A, Chebotareva N, Zakharova N, Semenov S Molecules. 2023; 28(8).

PMID: 37110557 PMC: 10142111. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28083323.


Defining diagnostic trajectories in patients with podocytopathies.

Cirillo L, Lugli G, Raglianti V, Ravaglia F, Buti E, Landini S Clin Kidney J. 2022; 15(11):2006-2019.

PMID: 36325008 PMC: 9613436. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac123.


References
1.
Du Bois D, Du Bois E . A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition. 1989; 5(5):303-11; discussion 312-3. View

2.
Woroniecki R, Shatat I, Supe K, Du Z, Kaskel F . Urinary cytokines and steroid responsiveness in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Am J Nephrol. 2007; 28(1):83-90. DOI: 10.1159/000109396. View

3.
Lapolla A, Seraglia R, Molin L, Williams K, Cosma C, Reitano R . Low molecular weight proteins in urines from healthy subjects as well as diabetic, nephropathic and diabetic-nephropathic patients: a MALDI study. J Mass Spectrom. 2009; 44(3):419-25. DOI: 10.1002/jms.1520. View

4.
Jiang S, Wang Y, Liu Z . The application of urinary proteomics for the detection of biomarkers of kidney diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014; 845:151-65. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9523-4_15. View

5.
Gorg A, Weiss W, Dunn M . Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics. 2004; 4(12):3665-85. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200401031. View