» Articles » PMID: 28158730

Changes in the Skin Conductance Monitor As an End Point for Sympathetic Nerve Blocks

Overview
Journal Pain Med
Date 2017 Feb 4
PMID 28158730
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: There is a lack of objective methods for determining the achievement of sympathetic block. This study validates the skin conductance monitor (SCM) as an end point indicator of successful sympathetic blockade as compared with traditional monitors.

Methods: This interventional study included 13 patients undergoing 25 lumbar sympathetic blocks to compare time to indication of successful blockade between the SCM indices and traditional measures, clinically visible hyperemia, clinically visible engorgement of veins, subjective skin temperature difference, unilateral thermometry monitoring, bilateral comparative thermometry monitoring, and change in waveform amplitude in pulse oximetry plethysmography, within a 30-minute observation period. Differences in the SCM indices were studied pre- and postblock to validate the SCM.

Results: SCM showed substantially greater odds of indicating achievement of sympathetic block in the next moment (i.e., hazard rate) compared with all traditional measures (clinically visible hyperemia, clinically visible engorgement of veins, subjective temperature difference, unilateral thermometry monitoring, bilateral comparative thermometry monitoring, and change in waveform amplitude in pulse oximetry plethysmography; P ≤ 0.011). SCM indicated successful block for all (100%) procedures, while the traditional measures failed to indicate successful blocks in 16-84% of procedures. The SCM indices were significantly higher in preblock compared with postblock measurements (P < 0.005).

Conclusions: This preliminary study suggests that SCM is a more reliable and rapid response indicator of a successful sympathetic blockade when compared with traditional monitors.

Citing Articles

Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Infrared Thermography for the Assessment of Lumbar Sympathetic Blocks: A Preliminary Study.

Canada-Soriano M, Priego-Quesada J, Bovaira M, Garcia-Vitoria C, Palmer R, Cibrian Ortiz de Anda R Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(11).

PMID: 34063768 PMC: 8196638. DOI: 10.3390/s21113573.


Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block as a Sympathetic Blockade for Upper Extremity Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Kim J, Lee H, Lee Y, Lee C, Yoo Y, Moon J J Pain Res. 2020; 13:3395-3403.

PMID: 33363406 PMC: 7754269. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S285998.


Epidural approach to paravertebral thoracic sympathetic block as an alternative to stellate ganglion block: A case report.

Gungor S, Brar J Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(28):e11492.

PMID: 29995814 PMC: 6076206. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011492.

References
1.
Rutter N . The dermis. Semin Neonatol. 2000; 5(4):297-302. DOI: 10.1053/siny.2000.0016. View

2.
Stevens R, Stotz A, KAO T, Powar M, Burgess S, Kleinman B . The relative increase in skin temperature after stellate ganglion block is predictive of a complete sympathectomy of the hand. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998; 23(3):266-70. DOI: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90053-0. View

3.
Ackerman 3rd W, Ahmad M . The relative increase in skin temperature after stellate ganglion block is predictive of a complete sympathectomy of the hand. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999; 24(3):275-6. DOI: 10.1016/s1098-7339(99)90148-7. View

4.
Bini G, HAGBARTH K, Hynninen P, Wallin B . Thermoregulatory and rhythm-generating mechanisms governing the sudomotor and vasoconstrictor outflow in human cutaneous nerves. J Physiol. 1980; 306:537-52. PMC: 1283022. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013413. View

5.
Payne A, Dawson M, Schell A, Singh K, Courtney C . Can you give me a hand? A comparison of hands and feet as optimal anatomical sites for skin conductance recording. Psychophysiology. 2013; 50(11):1065-9. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12093. View