» Articles » PMID: 28155286

Wildlife-livestock Interactions and Risk Areas for Cross-species Spread of Bovine Tuberculosis

Overview
Date 2017 Feb 4
PMID 28155286
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The transmission of diseases between livestock and wildlife can be a hindrance to effective disease control. Maintenance hosts and contact rates should be explored to further understand the transmission dynamics at the wildlife-livestock interface. Bovine tuberculosis (BTB) has been shown to have wildlife maintenance hosts and has been confirmed as present in the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Queen Elizabeth National Park (QENP) in Uganda since the 1960s. The first aim of this study was to explore the spatio-temporal spread of cattle illegally grazing within the QENP recorded by the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) rangers in a wildlife crime database. Secondly, we aimed to quantify wildlife-livestock interactions and cattle movements, on the border of QENP, using a longitudinal questionnaire completed by 30 livestock owners. From this database, 426 cattle sightings were recorded within QENP in 8 years. Thirteen (3.1%) of these came within a 300 m-4 week space-time window of a buffalo herd, using the recorded GPS data. Livestock owners reported an average of 1.04 (95% CI 0.97-1.11) sightings of Uganda kob, waterbuck, buffalo or warthog per day over a 3-month period, with a rate of 0.22 (95% CI 0.20-0.25) sightings of buffalo per farmer per day. Reports placed 85.3% of the ungulate sightings and 88.0% of the buffalo sightings as further than 50 m away. Ungulate sightings were more likely to be closer to cattle at the homestead (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.6) compared with the grazing area. Each cattle herd mixed with an average of five other cattle herds at both the communal grazing and watering points on a daily basis. Although wildlife and cattle regularly shared grazing and watering areas, they seldom came into contact close enough for aerosol transmission. Between species infection transmission is therefore likely to be by indirect or non-respiratory routes, which is suspected to be an infrequent mechanism of transmission of BTB. Occasional cross-species spillover of infection is possible, and the interaction of multiple wildlife species needs further investigation. Controlling the interface between wildlife and cattle in a situation where eradication is not being considered may have little impact on BTB disease control in cattle.

Citing Articles

A scoping review on bovine tuberculosis highlights the need for novel data streams and analytical approaches to curb zoonotic diseases.

Conteddu K, English H, Byrne A, Amin B, Griffin L, Kaur P Vet Res. 2024; 55(1):64.

PMID: 38773649 PMC: 11110237. DOI: 10.1186/s13567-024-01314-w.


Contact between European bison and cattle from the cattle breeders' perspective, in the light of the risk of pathogen transmission.

Klich D, Didkowska A, Pyziel-Serafin A, Perlinska-Teresiak M, Woloszyn-Galeza A, Zoch K PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0285245.

PMID: 37134113 PMC: 10155960. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285245.


Peste Des Petits Ruminants in Atypical Hosts and Wildlife: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence between 2001 and 2021.

SowjanyaKumari S, Bhavya A, Akshata N, Kumar K, Bokade P, Suresh K Arch Razi Inst. 2022; 76(6):1589-1606.

PMID: 35546985 PMC: 9083865. DOI: 10.22092/ari.2021.356900.1939.


Zoonotic Tuberculosis - The Changing Landscape.

Kock R, Michel A, Yeboah-Manu D, Azhar E, Torrelles J, Cadmus S Int J Infect Dis. 2021; 113 Suppl 1:S68-S72.

PMID: 33713812 PMC: 8672060. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.091.


Prioritizing smallholder animal health needs in East Africa, West Africa, and South Asia using three approaches: Literature review, expert workshops, and practitioner surveys.

Campbell Z, Coleman P, Guest A, Kushwaha P, Ramuthivheli T, Osebe T Prev Vet Med. 2021; 189:105279.

PMID: 33581421 PMC: 8024747. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105279.


References
1.
Siembieda J, Kock R, McCracken T, Newman S . The role of wildlife in transboundary animal diseases. Anim Health Res Rev. 2011; 12(1):95-111. DOI: 10.1017/S1466252311000041. View

2.
Brooks-Pollock E, Wood J . Eliminating bovine tuberculosis in cattle and badgers: insight from a dynamic model. Proc Biol Sci. 2015; 282(1808):20150374. PMC: 4455805. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0374. View

3.
Zanella G, Bar-Hen A, Boschiroli M, Hars J, Moutou F, Garin-Bastuji B . Modelling transmission of bovine tuberculosis in red deer and wild boar in Normandy, France. Zoonoses Public Health. 2012; 59 Suppl 2:170-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2011.01453.x. View

4.
Michel A, de Klerk L, Gey van Pittius N, Warren R, van Helden P . Bovine tuberculosis in African buffaloes: observations regarding Mycobacterium bovis shedding into water and exposure to environmental mycobacteria. BMC Vet Res. 2007; 3:23. PMC: 2151946. DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-3-23. View

5.
Woodford M . Tuberculosis in wildlife in the Ruwenzori National Park, Uganda (Part II). Trop Anim Health Prod. 1982; 14(3):155-160. DOI: 10.1007/BF02242146. View