» Articles » PMID: 28155094

Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices

Overview
Journal Sci Eng Ethics
Date 2017 Feb 4
PMID 28155094
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Health Wearable Devices enhance the quality of life, promote positive lifestyle changes and save time and money in medical appointments. However, Wearable Devices store large amounts of personal information that is accessed by third parties without user consent. This creates ethical issues regarding privacy, security and informed consent. This paper aims to demonstrate users' ethical perceptions of the use of Wearable Devices in the health sector. The impact of ethics is determined by an online survey which was conducted from patients and users with random female and male division. Results from this survey demonstrate that Wearable Device users are highly concerned regarding privacy issues and consider informed consent as "very important" when sharing information with third parties. However, users do not appear to relate privacy issues with informed consent. Additionally, users expressed the need for having shorter privacy policies that are easier to read, a more understandable informed consent form that involves regulatory authorities and there should be legal consequences the violation or misuse of health information provided to Wearable Devices. The survey results present an ethical framework that will enhance the ethical development of Wearable Technology.

Citing Articles

The Association of Psychological Factors With Willingness to Share Health-Related Data From Technological Devices: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Eversdijk M, Douma E, Habibovic M, Kop W JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e64244.

PMID: 39864105 PMC: 11780973. DOI: 10.2196/64244.


Behind the good of digital tools for occupational safety and health: a scoping review of ethical issues surrounding the use of the internet of things.

El Bouchikhi M, Weerts S, Clavien C Front Public Health. 2025; 12():1468646.

PMID: 39802321 PMC: 11719680. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1468646.


The internet of things deployed for occupational health and safety purposes: A qualitative study of opportunities and ethical issues.

El Bouchikhi M, Weerts S, Clavien C PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315671.

PMID: 39689137 PMC: 11651608. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315671.


Wearable Devices for Long COVID: Prospects, Challenges and Options.

Chan H Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024; 16(4):757-769.

PMID: 39398460 PMC: 11465094. DOI: 10.1007/s41649-023-00272-3.


The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence, Wearable Devices, and Sexual Medicine.

Smerina D, Pearlman A Curr Urol Rep. 2024; 26(1):14.

PMID: 39392527 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01244-2.


References
1.
Hofmann B . Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012; 19(2):389-406. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9348-1. View

2.
Safavi S, Shukur Z . Conceptual privacy framework for health information on wearable device. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e114306. PMC: 4257553. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114306. View

3.
Al-Saggaf Y . The use of data mining by private health insurance companies and customers' privacy. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015; 24(3):281-92. DOI: 10.1017/S0963180114000607. View

4.
Jacquemard T, Novitzky P, OBrolchain F, Smeaton A, Gordijn B . Challenges and opportunities of lifelog technologies: a literature review and critical analysis. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013; 20(2):379-409. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9456-1. View

5.
Chan M, Esteve D, Fourniols J, Escriba C, Campo E . Smart wearable systems: current status and future challenges. Artif Intell Med. 2012; 56(3):137-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.09.003. View