» Articles » PMID: 28155091

Epi ProColon 2.0 CE: A Blood-Based Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Mol Diagn Ther
Date 2017 Feb 4
PMID 28155091
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Epi proColon 2.0 CE is a blood-based test designed to aid in the early detection of colorectal cancer. The test comprises a qualitative assay for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of methylated Septin9 DNA, the presence of which is associated with colorectal cancer: however, positive results should be verified by colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. Epi proColon 2.0 CE discriminated between patients with colorectal cancer and healthy controls with high clinical sensitivity and specificity in pivotal case-control studies. The sensitivity of the test did not appear to be affected by the tumour location or by patient age or gender. In addition, limited data suggest that Epi proColon 2.0 CE discriminated between patients with colorectal cancer and healthy controls with higher sensitivity and generally similar specificity to that of the faecal immunochemical test, and with higher sensitivity and specificity to that of the guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (statistical data not available). In an observational study, most patients who refused colonoscopy for screening accepted a non-invasive test option as an alternative, and preferred Epi proColon 2.0 CE over a stool-based test. Large prospective trials of Epi proColon 2.0 CE in a screening setting will be required to further elucidate the cost-effectiveness of the test. Nevertheless, currently available data suggests that Epi proColon 2.0 CE has the potential to be a sensitive and convenient screening option for patients refusing screening by colonoscopy.

Citing Articles

Harnessing ferroptosis for precision oncology: challenges and prospects.

Fernandez-Acosta R, Vintea I, Koeken I, Hassannia B, Vanden Berghe T BMC Biol. 2025; 23(1):57.

PMID: 39988655 PMC: 11849278. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-025-02154-6.


Advances in blood DNA methylation-based assay for colorectal cancer early detection: a systematic updated review.

Khabbazpour M, Tat M, Karbasi A, Abyazi M, Khodadoustan G, Heidary Z Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2024; 17(3):225-240.

PMID: 39308542 PMC: 11413380. DOI: 10.22037/ghfbb.v17i3.2978.


Recent Technologies towards Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications of Circulating Nucleic Acids in Colorectal Cancers.

Chung J, Xiao S, Gao Y, Soung Y Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).

PMID: 39201393 PMC: 11354501. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168703.


The Future of Kawasaki Disease Diagnosis: Liquid Biopsy May Hold the Key.

Markandran K, Clemente K, Tan E, Attal K, Chee Q, Cheung C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(15).

PMID: 39125631 PMC: 11311979. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25158062.


DNA methylation in human diseases.

Younesian S, Mohammadi M, Younesian O, Momeny M, Ghaffari S, Bashash D Heliyon. 2024; 10(11):e32366.

PMID: 38933971 PMC: 11200359. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32366.


References
1.
Park M, Choi K, Lee Y, Jun J, Lee H . A comparison of qualitative and quantitative fecal immunochemical tests in the Korean national colorectal cancer screening program. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012; 47(4):461-6. DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2012.668930. View

2.
Wu D, Zhou G, Jin P, Zhu J, Li S, Wu Q . Detection of Colorectal Cancer Using a Simplified SEPT9 Gene Methylation Assay Is a Reliable Method for Opportunistic Screening. J Mol Diagn. 2016; 18(4):535-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.02.005. View

3.
McPhail S, Johnson S, Greenberg D, Peake M, Rous B . Stage at diagnosis and early mortality from cancer in England. Br J Cancer. 2015; 112 Suppl 1:S108-15. PMC: 4385983. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.49. View

4.
Lofton-Day C, Model F, deVos T, Tetzner R, Distler J, Schuster M . DNA methylation biomarkers for blood-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin Chem. 2007; 54(2):414-23. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.095992. View

5.
Jin P, Kang Q, Wang X, Yang L, Yu Y, Li N . Performance of a second-generation methylated SEPT9 test in detecting colorectal neoplasm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 30(5):830-3. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12855. View