» Articles » PMID: 28153931

Physical Activity on Prescription Schemes (PARS): Do Programme Characteristics Influence Effectiveness? Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Feb 4
PMID 28153931
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Physical activity on prescription schemes (PARS) are health promotion programmes that have been implemented in various countries. The aim of this study was to outline the differences in the design of PARS in different countries. This study also explored the differences in the adherence rate to PARS and the self-reported level of physical activity between PARS users in different countries.

Method: A systematic literature review and meta-analyses were conducted. We searched PubMed and EBASCO in July 2015 and updated our search in September 2015. Studies that reported adherence to the programme and self-reported level of physical activity, published in the English language in a peer-reviewed journal since 2000, were included. The difference in the pooled adherence rate after finishing the PARS programme and the adherence rate before or during the PARS programme was 17% (95% CI 9% to 24%). The difference in the pooled physical activity was 0.93 unit score (95 CI -3.57 to 1.71). For the adherence rate, a meta-regression was conducted.

Results: In total, 37 studies conducted in 11 different countries met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 31 reported the adherence rate, while the level of physical activity was reported in 17 studies. Results from meta-analyses show that PARS had an effect on the adherence rate of physical activity, while the results from the meta-regressions show that programme characteristics such as type of chronic disease and the follow-up period influenced the adherence rate.

Conclusions: The effects of PARS on adherence and self-reported physical activity were influenced by programme characteristics and also by the design of the study. Future studies on the effectiveness of PARS should use a prospective longitudinal design and combine quantitative and qualitative data. Furthermore, future evaluation studies should distinguish between evaluating the adherence rate and the self-reported physical activity among participants with different chronic diseases.

Citing Articles

Coproducing a physical activity referral scheme in Germany: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder experiences.

Klamroth S, Mino E, Naber I, Weissenfels A, Geidl W, Gelius P BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e082710.

PMID: 38777585 PMC: 11116878. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082710.


A systematic review and narrative synthesis of physical activity referral schemes' components.

Mino E, Hanson C, Naber I, Weissenfels A, Mchale S, Saftig J Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):140.

PMID: 38012688 PMC: 10683187. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01518-x.


Prerequisites for implementing physical activity on prescription for children with obesity in paediatric health care: A cross-sectional survey.

Boman C, Bernhardsson S, Lauruschkus K, Lundqvist S, Melin K Front Health Serv. 2023; 2:1102328.

PMID: 36925834 PMC: 10012761. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1102328.


Cost-Effectiveness of Prolonged Physical Activity on Prescription in Previously Non-Complying Patients: Impact of Physical Activity Mediators.

Ryen L, Lundqvist S, Cider A, Borjesson M, Larsson M, Hagberg L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36900811 PMC: 10001088. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20053801.


Motivation 2 Quit (M2Q): A cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of Tobacco Cessation on Prescription in Swedish primary healthcare.

Leppanen A, Lindgren P, Sundberg C, Petzold M, Tomson T PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0278369.

PMID: 36454921 PMC: 9714827. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278369.


References
1.
Moore G, Moore L, Murphy S . Facilitating adherence to physical activity: exercise professionals' experiences of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:935. PMC: 3265446. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-935. View

2.
Fortier M, Hogg W, OSullivan T, Blanchard C, Reid R, Sigal R . The physical activity counselling (PAC) randomized controlled trial: rationale, methods, and interventions. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007; 32(6):1170-85. DOI: 10.1139/H07-075. View

3.
Tudor Edwards R, Linck P, Hounsome N, Raisanen L, Williams N, Moore L . Cost-effectiveness of a national exercise referral programme for primary care patients in Wales: results of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:1021. PMC: 4231449. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1021. View

4.
Anokye N, Trueman P, Green C, Pavey T, Hillsdon M, Taylor R . The cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:954. PMC: 3268756. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-954. View

5.
Lamb S, Bartlett H, Ashley A, Bird W . Can lay-led walking programmes increase physical activity in middle aged adults? A randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56(4):246-52. PMC: 1732126. DOI: 10.1136/jech.56.4.246. View