» Articles » PMID: 28151702

The Athletic Shoe in Football

Overview
Journal Sports Health
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Feb 3
PMID 28151702
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Foot and ankle injuries are common in sports, particularly in cleated athletes. Traditionally, the athletic shoe has not been regarded as a piece of protective equipment but rather as a part of the uniform, with a primary focus on performance and subjective feedback measures of comfort. Changes in turf and shoe design have poorly understood implications on the health and safety of players.

Evidence Acquisition: A literature search of the MEDLINE and PubMed databases was conducted. Keywords included athletic shoewear, cleated shoe, football shoes, and shoewear, and search parameters were between the years 2000 and 2016.

Study Design: Clinical review.

Level Of Evidence: Level 5.

Results: The athletic shoe is an important piece of protective sports equipment. There are several important structural considerations of shoe design, including biomechanical compliance, cleat and turf interaction, and shoe sizing/fit, that affect the way an athlete engages with the playing surface and carry important potential implications regarding player safety if not understood and addressed.

Conclusion: Athletic footwear should be considered an integral piece of protective equipment rather than simply an extension of the uniform apparel. More research is needed to define optimal shoe sizing, the effect that design has on mechanical load, and how cleat properties, including pattern and structure, interact with the variety of playing surfaces.

Citing Articles

Influence of playing surface on match injury risk in men's professional rugby union in England (2013-2019).

Robertson C, Williams S, West S, Starling L, Kemp S, Cross M Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2022; 32(11):1615-1624.

PMID: 36004455 PMC: 9825862. DOI: 10.1111/sms.14226.


Foot and Ankle Awareness in the Athlete.

Anderson R Sports Health. 2022; 14(3):309-310.

PMID: 35546065 PMC: 9112715. DOI: 10.1177/19417381221089976.


A novel method for internal fixation of basal fifth metatarsal fracture in athletes: a cadaveric study of the F.E.R.I. technique (Fifth metatarsal, Extra-portal, Rigid, Innovative).

DHooghe P, Caravelli S, Massimi S, Calder J, Dzendrowskyj P, Zaffagnini S J Exp Orthop. 2019; 6(1):45.

PMID: 31713049 PMC: 6848546. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-019-0213-5.


Shoe Power.

Wojtys E Sports Health. 2018; 10(5):396-397.

PMID: 30153103 PMC: 6116105. DOI: 10.1177/1941738118792874.


Synthetic Turf: History, Design, Maintenance, and Athlete Safety.

Jastifer J, McNitt A, Mack C, Kent R, McCullough K, Coughlin M Sports Health. 2018; 11(1):84-90.

PMID: 30096021 PMC: 6299344. DOI: 10.1177/1941738118793378.


References
1.
Lambson R, Barnhill B, Higgins R . Football cleat design and its effect on anterior cruciate ligament injuries. A three-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24(2):155-9. DOI: 10.1177/036354659602400206. View

2.
Hootman J, Dick R, Agel J . Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007; 42(2):311-9. PMC: 1941297. View

3.
Roy J, Stefanyshyn D . Shoe midsole longitudinal bending stiffness and running economy, joint energy, and EMG. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(3):562-9. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000193562.22001.e8. View

4.
Hershman E, Anderson R, Bergfeld J, Bradley J, Coughlin M, Johnson R . An analysis of specific lower extremity injury rates on grass and FieldTurf playing surfaces in National Football League Games: 2000-2009 seasons. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(10):2200-5. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512458888. View

5.
Frimenko R, Lievers W, Riley P, Park J, Hogan M, Crandall J . Development of an injury risk function for first metatarsophalangeal joint sprains. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45(11):2144-50. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182994a10. View