» Articles » PMID: 28150291

Presence of Multiple Coronary Angiographic Characteristics for the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Thrombus

Overview
Journal Cardiol J
Date 2017 Feb 3
PMID 28150291
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Coronary angiography is frequently employed to aid in the diagnosis of acute coronary thrombosis, but there is limited data to support its efficacy. The aim of the study was to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of five commonly used angiographic characteristics for diagnosis of acute coronary thrombosis: Ambrose complex lesion morphology; spherical, ovoid, or irregular filling defect; abrupt vessel cutoff; intraluminal staining; and any coronary filling defect.

Methods: Coronary angiography of 80 acute myocardial infarction or stable coronary artery disease subjects were assessed in blinded fashion, for the presence or absence of five angiographic characteristics. Only lesions of ≥ 10% stenosis were included in the analysis. Presence or absence of each angiographic characteristic was compared between lesions with or without the following study defined outcomes: 1) histologically confirmed thrombus, 2) highly probable thrombus, and 3) highly unlikely thrombus.

Results: A total of 323 lesions were evaluated. All studied angiographic characteristics were associated with histologically confirmed and highly probable thrombotic lesions vs. lesions not meeting criteria for these outcomes (p < 0.03), except for complex Ambrose morphology which was not associated with any of the study outcomes (p > 0.05). Specificity for identifying histologically confirmed or highly probable thrombotic lesion was high (92-100%), especially for spherical, ovoid, or irregular filling defect (99-100%) and intraluminal staining (99%). Sensitivity for identification of histologically confirmed or highly probable thrombotic lesions was low for all tested angiographic characteristics (17-60%).

Conclusions: The presence of spherical, ovoid, or irregular filling defect or intraluminal staining was highly suggestive of coronary thrombus. However, none of the evaluated angiographic characteristics were useful for ruling out the presence of coronary thrombus. If confirmed in an independent cohort, these angiographic characteristic will be of significant value in confirming the diagnosis of acute coronary thrombosis.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Relationship between Acute Coronary Syndrome, Lower Respiratory Tract Infections, and Atmospheric Pollution.

Muszynski P, Pawluczuk E, Januszko T, Kruszynska J, Duzinkiewicz M, Kurasz A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(17).

PMID: 39274250 PMC: 11396614. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175037.


Type 2 MI and Myocardial Injury in the Era of High-sensitivity Troponin.

Rafiudeen R, Barlis P, White H, van Gaal W Eur Cardiol. 2022; 17:e03.

PMID: 35284006 PMC: 8900132. DOI: 10.15420/ecr.2021.42.


Molecular Imaging and Non-molecular Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Thrombosis.

Guo B, Li Z, Tu P, Tang H, Tu Y Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:692915.

PMID: 34291095 PMC: 8286992. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.692915.


Change in matrix metalloproteinase 2, 3, and 9 levels at the time of and after acute atherothrombotic myocardial infarction.

Owolabi U, Amraotkar A, Coulter A, Singam N, Aladili B, Singh A J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019; 49(2):235-244.

PMID: 31808123 PMC: 9012982. DOI: 10.1007/s11239-019-02004-7.


Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Acute Nonischemic Myocardial Injury.

DeFilippis A, Chapman A, Mills N, de Lemos J, Arbab-Zadeh A, Newby L Circulation. 2019; 140(20):1661-1678.

PMID: 31416350 PMC: 6855329. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040631.

References
1.
Anderson J, Adams C, Antman E, Bridges C, Califf R, Casey Jr D . 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart.... Circulation. 2011; 123(18):e426-579. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318212bb8b. View

2.
Corti R, Fuster V, Badimon J . Pathogenetic concepts of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41(4 Suppl S):7S-14S. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02833-4. View

3.
Thygesen K, Alpert J, Jaffe A, Chaitman B, White H, Katus H . Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012; 126(16):2020-35. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058. View

4.
Ambrose J, Loures-Vale A, Javed U, Buhari C, Aftab W . Angiographic correlates in type 1 and 2 MI by the universal definition. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5(4):463-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.12.016. View

5.
Hancock E, Deal B, Mirvis D, Okin P, Kligfield P, Gettes L . AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.... Circulation. 2009; 119(10):e251-61. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191097. View