» Articles » PMID: 28149257

PCR-based Assays for Validation of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers in Rice and Mungbean

Overview
Journal Hereditas
Specialty Genetics
Date 2017 Feb 3
PMID 28149257
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers are the method of choice for genetic analyses including diversity and quantitative trait loci (QTL) studies. Marker validation is essential for QTL studies, but the cost and workload are considerable when large numbers of markers need to be verified. Marker systems with low development costs would be most suitable for this task.

Results: We have tested allele specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), tetra markers and a genotyping tool based on the single strand specific nuclease CEL-I to verify randomly selected SNP markers identified previously either with a SNP array or by genotyping by sequencing in rice and mungbean, respectively. The genotyping capacity of allele-specific PCR and tetra markers was affected by the sequence context surrounding the SNP; SNPs located in repeated sequences and in GC-rich stretches could not be correctly identified. In contrast, CEL-I digestion of mixed fragments produced from test and reference DNA reliably pinpointed the correct genotypes, yet scoring of the genotypes became complicated when multiple SNPs were present in the PCR fragments. A cost analysis showed that as long the sample number remains small, CEL-I genotyping is more cost-effective than tetra markers.

Conclusions: CEL-I genotyping performed better in terms of genotyping accuracy and costs than tetra markers. The method is highly useful for validating SNPs in small to medium size germplasm panels.

Citing Articles

Development of a web-based high-throughput marker design program: CAPS (cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence) Maker.

Park J, Choi Y, Kim J, Lee C, Jeong M, Jeong Y Plant Methods. 2024; 20(1):192.

PMID: 39719584 PMC: 11669248. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-024-01319-8.


An electrochemical biosensor for the rapid genetic identification of Musang King durian.

Faizal Azizi M, Romeli S, Razali H, Ariffin E, Tajol Ariffin M, Heng L Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):19324.

PMID: 36369187 PMC: 9652400. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20998-8.


Machine learning, transcriptome, and genotyping chip analyses provide insights into SNP markers identifying flower color in Platycodon grandiflorus.

Yu G, Shin Y, Subramaniyam S, Kang S, Lee S, Cho C Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):8019.

PMID: 33850210 PMC: 8044237. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87281-0.


Comparison of TaqMan, KASP and rhAmp SNP genotyping platforms in hexaploid wheat.

Ayalew H, Tsang P, Chu C, Wang J, Liu S, Chen C PLoS One. 2019; 14(5):e0217222.

PMID: 31116793 PMC: 6530864. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217222.

References
1.
Tang W, Wu T, Ye J, Sun J, Jiang Y, Yu J . SNP-based analysis of genetic diversity reveals important alleles associated with seed size in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2016; 16:93. PMC: 4837510. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-016-0779-3. View

2.
Ganal M, Polley A, Graner E, Plieske J, Wieseke R, Luerssen H . Large SNP arrays for genotyping in crop plants. J Biosci. 2012; 37(5):821-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12038-012-9225-3. View

3.
Elshire R, Glaubitz J, Sun Q, Poland J, Kawamoto K, Buckler E . A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One. 2011; 6(5):e19379. PMC: 3087801. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379. View

4.
Kang Y, Kim S, Kim M, Lestari P, Kim K, Ha B . Genome sequence of mungbean and insights into evolution within Vigna species. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:5443. PMC: 4241982. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6443. View

5.
Medrano R, de Oliveira C . Guidelines for the tetra-primer ARMS-PCR technique development. Mol Biotechnol. 2014; 56(7):599-608. DOI: 10.1007/s12033-014-9734-4. View