» Articles » PMID: 28148293

TP53 Mutation-mediated Genomic Instability Induces the Evolution of Chemoresistance and Recurrence in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Overview
Journal Diagn Pathol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Pathology
Date 2017 Feb 3
PMID 28148293
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Genomic instability caused by mutation of the checkpoint molecule TP53 may endow cancer cells with the ability to undergo genomic evolution to survive stress and treatment. We attempted to gain insight into the potential contribution of ovarian cancer genomic instability resulted from TP53 mutation to the aberrant expression of multidrug resistance gene MDR1.

Methods: TP53 mutation status was assessed by performing nucleotide sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Ovarian cancer cell DNA ploidy was determined using Feulgen-stained smears or flow cytometry. DNA copy number was analyzed by performing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Results: In addition to performing nucleotide sequencing for 5 cases of ovarian cancer, TP53 mutations were analyzed via immunohistochemical staining for P53. Both intensive P53 immunohistochemical staining and complete absence of signal were associated with the occurrence of TP53 mutations. HE staining and the quantification of DNA content indicated a significantly higher proportion of polyploidy and aneuploidy cells in the TP53 mutant group than in the wild-type group (p < 0.05). Moreover, in 161 epithelial ovarian cancer patients, multivariate logistic analysis identified late FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage, serous histotype, G3 grade and TP53 mutation as independent risk factors for ovarian cancer recurrence. In relapse patients, the proportion of chemoresistant cases in the TP53 wild-type group was significantly lower than in the mutant group (63.6% vs. 91.8%, p < 0.05). FISH results revealed a higher percentage of cells with >6 MDR1 copies and chromosome 7 amplication in the TP53 mutant group than in the wild-type group [11.7 ± 2.3% vs. 3.0 ± 0.7% and 2.1 ± 0.7% vs. 0.3 ± 0.05%, (p < 0.05), respectively]. And we observed a specific increase of MDR1 and chromosome 7 copy numbers in the TP53 mutant group upon disease regression (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: TP53 mutation-associated genomic instability may promote chromosome 7 accumulation and MDR1 amplification during ovarian cancer chemoresistance and recurrence. Our findings lay the foundation for the development of promising chemotherapeutic approaches to treat aggressive and recurrent ovarian cancer.

Citing Articles

Sodium arsenite-induced DNA methylation alterations exacerbated by p53 knockout in MCF7 cells.

Chung F, Khoueiry R, Salle A, Cuenin C, Boskovic M, Herceg Z Heliyon. 2024; 10(21):e39548.

PMID: 39512451 PMC: 11539298. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39548.


A novel ITGB8 transcript variant sustains ovarian cancer cell survival through genomic instability and altered ploidy on a mutant p53 background.

Narayanan A, More A, Talreja M, Mali A, Vinay S, Bapat S J Ovarian Res. 2024; 17(1):218.

PMID: 39506768 PMC: 11539462. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-024-01538-6.


Mutation-Mediated Immune Evasion in Cancer: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.

Wang C, Tan J, Chitkara N, Bhatt S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272927 PMC: 11393945. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173069.


Complexity of the Genetic Background of Oncogenesis in Ovarian Cancer-Genetic Instability and Clinical Implications.

Murawski M, Jagodzinski A, Bielawska-Pohl A, Klimczak A Cells. 2024; 13(4.

PMID: 38391958 PMC: 10886918. DOI: 10.3390/cells13040345.


Rescue of p53 functions by in vitro-transcribed mRNA impedes the growth of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Raab M, Kostova I, Pena-Llopis S, Fietz D, Kressin M, Aberoumandi S Cancer Commun (Lond). 2023; 44(1):101-126.

PMID: 38140698 PMC: 10794014. DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12511.


References
1.
Perlman R . Evolution and medicine. Perspect Biol Med. 2013; 56(2):167-83. DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2013.0012. View

2.
Mittica G, Genta S, Aglietta M, Valabrega G . Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A New Opportunity in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer?. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17(7). PMC: 4964540. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071169. View

3.
Cunningham J, Gatenby R, Brown J . Evolutionary dynamics in cancer therapy. Mol Pharm. 2011; 8(6):2094-100. PMC: 3250072. DOI: 10.1021/mp2002279. View

4.
Rajagopalan H, Lengauer C . Aneuploidy and cancer. Nature. 2004; 432(7015):338-41. DOI: 10.1038/nature03099. View

5.
Vang R, Levine D, Soslow R, Zaloudek C, Shih I, Kurman R . Molecular Alterations of TP53 are a Defining Feature of Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Rereview of Cases Lacking TP53 Mutations in The Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Study. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015; 35(1):48-55. PMC: 4696053. DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000207. View