» Articles » PMID: 28133583

Breast Cancer Screening for High-Risk Patients of Different Ages and Risk - Which Modality Is Most Effective?

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2017 Jan 31
PMID 28133583
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While the guidelines for breast cancer screening in average-risk women are well established, screening in high-risk women is not as clear. For women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, current guidelines recommend screening by clinical breast examination and mammography starting at age 30. For certain high-risk women, additional screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is encouraged. This review focuses on differentiating imaging modalities used for screening women at high-risk for breast cancer over the age of 50 by discussing the different imaging techniques, cost versus benefit, detection rates, and impact on survival. While mammography is the only imaging modality proven to reduce mortality from breast cancer, MRI is more sensitive in identifying cancers. MRI can often identify smaller malignancies at a greater resolution at an earlier stage. The use of MRI would be more cost effective as there would be less need for invasive therapeutic procedures. Research thus far has not identified an age-specific preference in imaging modality. There are no guidelines for high-risk women that specify screening with respect to age (i.e., older than 50 years old). More research is needed before screening guidelines in different age groups with various risk factors can be established.

Citing Articles

In vitro fertilization impact on the risk of breast cancer.

Mihai A, Ianculescu L, Cretoiu D, Suciu N Arch Clin Cases. 2024; 11(3):73-82.

PMID: 39479256 PMC: 11520175. DOI: 10.22551/2024.44.1103.10292.


Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Could it be used as a screening test?.

Nagadi D, Elsayed N Saudi Med J. 2024; 45(8):799-807.

PMID: 39074890 PMC: 11288493. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.8.20230748.


Enhanced breast mass mammography classification approach based on pre-processing and hybridization of transfer learning models.

Boudouh S, Bouakkaz M J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(16):14549-14564.

PMID: 37567987 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05249-1.


Understanding Breast Cancers through Spatial and High-Resolution Visualization Using Imaging Technologies.

Takahashi H, Kawahara D, Kikuchi Y Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(17).

PMID: 36077616 PMC: 9454728. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174080.


Loss of TRIM31 promotes breast cancer progression through regulating K48- and K63-linked ubiquitination of p53.

Guo Y, Li Q, Zhao G, Zhang J, Yuan H, Feng T Cell Death Dis. 2021; 12(10):945.

PMID: 34650049 PMC: 8516922. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-021-04208-3.


References
1.
Sung J, Stamler S, Brooks J, Kaplan J, Huang T, Dershaw D . Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results. Radiology. 2016; 280(3):716-22. PMC: 5006733. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151419. View

2.
Henderson T, Amsterdam A, Bhatia S, Hudson M, Meadows A, Neglia J . Systematic review: surveillance for breast cancer in women treated with chest radiation for childhood, adolescent, or young adult cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152(7):444-55. PMC: 2857928. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-7-201004060-00009. View

3.
Brennan S, Liberman L, Dershaw D, Morris E . Breast MRI screening of women with a personal history of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(2):510-6. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3573. View

4.
Kriege M, Brekelmans C, Boetes C, Besnard P, Zonderland H, Obdeijn I . Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(5):427-37. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa031759. View

5.
Lehman C, Blume J, Weatherall P, Thickman D, Hylton N, Warner E . Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005; 103(9):1898-905. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20971. View