» Articles » PMID: 28129797

Vertical Root Fracture: Factors Related to Identification

Overview
Journal J Am Dent Assoc
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 Jan 29
PMID 28129797
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Vertical root fracture (VRF) requires root removal. Diagnostics for proper identification are critical. The author conducted a study to relate subjective, objective, and radiographic findings for VRF identification. They noted visual changes of root and overlying bone patterns after flap reflection.

Methods: The author examined a case series of roots with suspected VRF after flap reflection and root or root-end removal; 42 roots were identified with a fracture. Before reflection, the author obtained diagnostic and periapical radiographic data that included symptoms, soft-tissue changes, percussion, mobility, probing patterns, and radiographic findings. After flap reflection, the author evaluated bony changes and root surfaces. VRF was visually confirmed after tooth or root removal.

Results: Signs and symptoms diagnostic of VRF were inconsistent. All patients had endodontic therapy, many with posts, and for all patients, the pain was none to mild. In addition, the author found a history or presence of swelling (77%) or sinus tract (31%), that probing patterns differed (narrow-rectangular 66%), and that there was no defect in some patients (21%). Radiographic patterns varied from no change to extensive bone loss, and mobility ranged from none (55%) to slight or moderate (45%). Flap reflection revealed a "punched-out" bony lesion with granulomatous tissue (100%), and patterns were fenestration (21%) or dehiscence (79%). A fracture was visible on roots or resected root ends.

Conclusions: The author found no consistent signs, symptoms, or radiographic changes of VRF. Flap reflection was found to be predictably useful; fractured roots had bony defects filled with granulomatous tissue.

Practical Implications: VRF may be suspected from clinical findings; however, flap reflection is usually required for identification. Characteristic bony pattern and root visualization reveals the fracture, although root-end resection and examination is occasionally required.

Citing Articles

Position statement on longitudinal cracks and fractures of teeth.

Patel S, Teng P, Liao W, Davis M, Fidler A, Haupt F Int Endod J. 2025; 58(3):379-390.

PMID: 39840523 PMC: 11812625. DOI: 10.1111/iej.14186.


A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Top-Cited Articles on Vertical Root Fractures.

Arun Gopinathan P, Ui Haq I, Alfahad N, Alwatban S, Alghamdi A, Alamri A Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75300.

PMID: 39776737 PMC: 11706622. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75300.


Prevalence of Vertical Root Fractures in a University Endodontics Program versus a Private Endodontics Office.

Ek B, Zweig S, Roges R, Berdan Y, Roges R, Abulhamael A Int J Dent. 2023; 2023:2098629.

PMID: 38149084 PMC: 10751159. DOI: 10.1155/2023/2098629.


[Effect of various intracanal materials on the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in vertical root fractures].

Zhang J, Pan J, Sun Z, Wang X Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023; 55(2):333-338.

PMID: 37042146 PMC: 10091258.


Sensitivity and Specificity of MRI versus CBCT to Detect Vertical Root Fractures Using MicroCT as a Reference Standard.

Groenke B, Idiyatullin D, Gaalaas L, Petersen A, Law A, Barsness B J Endod. 2023; 49(6):703-709.

PMID: 36972896 PMC: 10330038. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.03.011.