» Articles » PMID: 28129753

Measuring Value Sensitivity in Medicine

Overview
Journal BMC Med Ethics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2017 Jan 29
PMID 28129753
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Value sensitivity - the ability to recognize value-related issues when they arise in practice - is an indispensable competence for medical practitioners to enter decision-making processes related to ethical questions. However, the psychological competence of value sensitivity is seldom an explicit subject in the training of medical professionals. In this contribution, we outline the traditional concept of moral sensitivity in medicine and its revised form conceptualized as value sensitivity and we propose an instrument that measures value sensitivity.

Methods: We developed an instrument for assessing the sensitivity for three value groups (moral-related values, values related to the principles of biomedical ethics, strategy-related values) in a four step procedure: 1) value identification (n = 317); 2) value representation (n = 317); 3) vignette construction and quality evaluation (n = 37); and 4) instrument validation by comparing nursing professionals with hospital managers (n = 48).

Results: We find that nursing professionals recognize and ascribe importance to principle-related issues more than professionals from hospital management. The latter are more likely to recognize and ascribe importance to strategy-related issues.

Conclusions: These hypothesis-driven results demonstrate the discriminatory power of our newly developed instrument, which makes it useful not only for health care professionals in practice but for students and people working in the clinical context as well.

Citing Articles

Moral sensitivity in business: A revised measure.

Schmocker D, Tanner C, Katsarov J, Christen M Curr Psychol. 2023; 42(12):10277-10291.

PMID: 37215736 PMC: 10195703. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01926-x.


Moral sensitivity of nursing students. Adaptation and validation of the moral sensitivity questionnaire in Spain.

Jimenez-Herrera M, Font-Jimenez I, Bazo-Hernandez L, Roldan-Merino J, Biurrun-Garrido A, Hurtado-Pardos B PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0270049.

PMID: 35709171 PMC: 9202884. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270049.


Deep Brain Stimulation: In Search of Reliable Instruments for Assessing Complex Personality-Related Changes.

Ineichen C, Baumann-Vogel H, Christen M Brain Sci. 2016; 6(3).

PMID: 27618110 PMC: 5039469. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci6030040.

References
1.
Comrie R . An analysis of undergraduate and graduate student nurses' moral sensitivity. Nurs Ethics. 2011; 19(1):116-27. DOI: 10.1177/0969733011411399. View

2.
Christen M, Ineichen C, Tanner C . How "moral" are the principles of biomedical ethics?--a cross-domain evaluation of the common morality hypothesis. BMC Med Ethics. 2014; 15:47. PMC: 4071216. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-47. View

3.
Akabayashi A, Slingsby B, Kai I, Nishimura T, Yamagishi A . The development of a brief and objective method for evaluating moral sensitivity and reasoning in medical students. BMC Med Ethics. 2004; 5:E1. PMC: 343288. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-5-1. View

4.
Chambers D . Developing a Self-Scoring Comprehensive Instrument to Measure Rest's Four-Component Model of Moral Behavior: The Moral Skills Inventory. J Dent Educ. 2011; 75(1):23-35. View

5.
Tanner C, Medin D . Protected values: no omission bias and no framing effects. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004; 11(1):185-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206481. View