Effect of Lactic Acid on Microleakage of Class V Low-Shrinkage Composite Restorations

Overview

Journal J Dent (Tehran)

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2017 Jan 28

PMID 28127313

Authors

Sedigheh Sadat Hashemikamangar

Seyed Jalal Pourhashemi

Zohre Nekooimehr

Mehrzad Gholampur Dehaki

Mohamad Javad Kharazifard

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effect of lactic acid (LA) on microleakage of silorane-based composite restorations and methacrylate-based composites with self-etch and etch-and-rinse bonding systems.

Materials And Methods: Class V cavities were prepared in 120 extracted human teeth, divided into four groups and restored as follows: 1. Silorane-based composite+P90 adhesive system (P90); 2. Filtek Z250+SE Bond (Z250SE); 3. Filtek Z350+SE Bond (Z350SE) and 4. Filtek Z250+Single Bond (Z250SB). Half of the samples in each group were immersed in LA and the other half in distilled water (DW) for seven days. Degree of microleakage was determined by dye penetration. Data were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney-U tests (type 1 error was considered 0.05 for primary and 0.017 for post-hoc tests).

Results: No significant difference was found in microleakage between LA and DW groups. The difference among groups in gingival margin microleakage was significant (P<0.05). The highest degree of microleakage was seen in Z250SB; which was significantly higher than Z250SE (DW: P=0.012 and LA: P=0.002) and Z350SE (DW: P=0.002 and LA: P=0.014). Microleakage was not significantly different between Z250SE and Z350SE (DW: P=0.683 and LA: P=0.533). The degree of microleakage of P90 in both media was lower than Z250SB and higher than that of Z250SE and Z350SE; but these differences were not significant.

Conclusions: Immersion in LA has no effect on microleakage of class V composite restorations regardless of the type of composite and adhesive system. At gingival margins, the highest microleakage occurred in Z250SB followed by P90 and self-etch groups.

References

Tay F, Pashley D, Yoshiyama M . Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res. 2002; 81(7):472-6. DOI: 10.1177/154405910208100708. View

Borgstrom M, Edwardsson S, Sullivan A, Svensater G . Dental plaque mass and acid production activity of the microbiota on teeth. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000; 108(5):412-7. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108005412.x. View

Mahmoud S, Al-Wakeel E . Marginal adaptation of ormocer-, silorane-, and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems bonded to dentin cavities after water storage. Quintessence Int. 2011; 42(10):e131-9. View

Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R . Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.007. View

Liu Y, Tjaderhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J . Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res. 2011; 90(8):953-68. PMC: 3148178. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510391799. View

Hegde M, Vyapaka P, Shetty S . A comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different newer direct composite resins using a self etching primer in class V cavities: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2010; 12(4):160-3. PMC: 2879729. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.58340. View

Lutz E, Krejci I, Oldenburg T . Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int. 1986; 17(12):777-84. View

Armstrong S, Vargas M, Chung I, Pashley D, Campbell J, Laffoon J . Resin-dentin interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile dentin bond strength after five-year water storage. Oper Dent. 2005; 29(6):705-12. View

Yu H, Wegehaupt F, Wiegand A, Roos M, Attin T, Buchalla W . Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel. J Dent. 2009; 37(12):913-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.07.006. View

10.

Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann K . Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. J Dent. 1997; 25(3-4):321-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00044-9. View

11.

Schmidt M, Kirkevang L, Horsted-Bindslev P, Poulsen S . Marginal adaptation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based composite: 1-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2010; 15(2):291-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0446-2. View

12.

Al-Boni R, Raja O . Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite. J Conserv Dent. 2010; 13(3):152-5. PMC: 2980613. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.71649. View

13.

Hashemikamangar S, Ghavam M, Mahinfar N, Kharazi Fard M . Effect of 30% hydrogen peroxide on marginal integrity of silorane-based versus methacrylate-based composite restorations. J Dent (Tehran). 2015; 11(5):545-53. PMC: 4290774. View

14.

Sharma R, Sharma J, Rani A . Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation between nanocomposites and microhybrid composites exposed to two light cure units. Indian J Dent Res. 2011; 22(3):495. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.87082. View

15.

Distler W, KRONCKE A . The acid pattern in human dental plaque. J Dent Res. 1983; 62(2):87-91. DOI: 10.1177/00220345830620021801. View

16.

Cadenaro M, Breschi L, Antoniolli F, Navarra C, Mazzoni A, Tay F . Degree of conversion of resin blends in relation to ethanol content and hydrophilicity. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(9):1194-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.012. View

17.

Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H . In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res. 2000; 79(6):1385-91. DOI: 10.1177/00220345000790060601. View

18.

Santos P, Silva M, Bruschi Alonso R, DAlpino P . Hydrolytic degradation of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite restorations: Evaluation of push-out strength and marginal adaptation. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71(5):1273-9. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2012.757649. View

19.

Mujdeci A, Gokay O . Effect of bleaching agents on the microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95(4):286-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.010. View

20.

Hardan L, Amm E, Ghayad A, Ghosn C, Khraisat A . Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II. Odontostomatol Trop. 2010; 32(126):29-37. View